Skip to main content

Security report for zalabaze.lv

Zaļā Bāze · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zaļā Bāze is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in flowers, bouquets, plants, sweets, and greeting cards. The website is built on the Shopify platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations such as Facebook Pixel for marketing and Shopify analytics for performance tracking. The business targets general consumers in Latvia, offering a variety of floral products with clear pricing and product categorization. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and accessibility, providing a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zalabaze.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small local online flower shop with a straightforward e-commerce business model. It focuses on retail sales of floral products and related gifts, targeting customers primarily in Riga and Latvia. The presence of free delivery offers and clear contact phone numbers indicates customer service orientation. The use of Shopify and Facebook marketing tools suggests a moderate digital marketing strategy. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses hCaptcha for form protection, indicating a good baseline security posture. Security headers are likely managed by Shopify defaults, though explicit headers are not visible in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of published privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies represents a compliance gap. Incident response and security policy information are also missing, which could impact trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add terms of service and clearly state security policies and incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking pixels to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance trust signals by adding certifications, customer testimonials, or security badges.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zaļā Bāze
Description
Online flower and plant shop offering bouquets, roses, flowers, plants, sweets, and greeting cards primarily targeting Latvian customers.
Key services
Flower bouquets, Roses, Various flowers, Plants, Sweets, Greeting cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, JavaScript, Shopify Liquid, Facebook Pixel, hCaptcha, Web fonts (Google Fonts), Flickity slider
Frameworks
Shopify storefront
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha for form protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure payment integration via Shopify

Analytics and tracking

Services
Shopify Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Shopify Pixel
Marketing tools
Shopify analytics, Facebook tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Shopify-based e-commerce store selling flowers and related products.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. Contact phone number is prominently displayed in ticker and menu.
  4. Multiple product categories with images and prices are presented clearly.
  5. Use of Facebook Pixel and Shopify analytics for marketing and tracking.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. Good technical implementation with modern web technologies.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Shopify's CDN infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and Shopify's Liquid templating system. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with some deferred scripts and preloading optimizations. The technical stack is standard for Shopify stores, minimizing technical debt but reliant on platform updates. No critical technical risks were identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zalabaze.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zalabaze.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.