Skip to main content

Security report for yottaa.com

Yottaa · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yottaa, Inc. is a technology company specializing in eCommerce site performance optimization. Their platform focuses on accelerating, monitoring, and automating website performance to improve conversion rates and revenue growth for online retailers. The company positions itself as a key enabler of faster, more shoppable eCommerce experiences, targeting medium to large eCommerce businesses. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive policies, and extensive use of marketing and analytics technologies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot, indicating a modern and data-driven infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, though public security policies and incident response details are not disclosed. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professionalism and trust indicators support its legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of yottaa.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain staging.yottaa.com points to unregistered service dpu-load-balancer-1544281335.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yottaa.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yottaa operates in the technology sector with a focus on eCommerce performance optimization. Their business model is B2B SaaS, providing tools that help online retailers improve site speed and conversion rates. The company targets eCommerce businesses seeking to enhance user experience and revenue. Market positioning is strong with a clear value proposition and established brand presence. The website content and linked social media profiles indicate active engagement and marketing efforts. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their SaaS platform. Partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms enhance their ecosystem. The company appears medium-sized with a US-based headquarters. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The security score is solid but could be enhanced by publishing dedicated security documentation and providing direct security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Add explicit security contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing certifications or compliance attestations if applicable.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Yottaa, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yottaa
Description
Yottaa optimizes, monitors, and automates site performance to deliver faster, more shoppable eCommerce sites that drive conversion rates and sustainable revenue growth.
Key services
Site performance optimization, Monitoring and automation, Conversion rate improvement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crazy Egg, HubSpot, NitroPack
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and modern design with clear business focus
  3. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools
  4. No direct registrant WHOIS data available, possibly privacy protected
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder framework, supported by a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crazy Egg, HubSpot, and NitroPack for performance optimization. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. SEO and accessibility features are well implemented with proper meta tags and responsive design. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 +5Low25 findingsView report
  2. 71/100 +10Medium31 findingsView report
  3. 61/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yottaa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yottaa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.