Skip to main content

Security report for ozilaigoal.com

Ozil Goal AI · Technology

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ozil Goal AI is a specialized online platform offering AI-generated videos that recreate Mesut Özil's iconic 2016 goal against Ludogorets using a single user photo. The service targets social media users and football fans who want to participate in a viral trend by creating personalized vertical videos. The business operates on a credit-based model with transparent pricing and no subscription requirements. Technically, the website is built with modern web technologies including React, and employs privacy-conscious analytics tools such as Plausible alongside Google Tag Manager. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and provides a professional user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive content including FAQs and guides. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and formal security policies. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, though it could improve privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 2 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga, _ga_W3EEYCF2NR). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.ozilaigoal.com, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.ozilaigoal.com, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@ozilaigoal.com" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ozilaigoal.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
91
Email security
72
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
75
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche market segment focused on AI-driven multimedia content creation tied to a viral football goal trend. Its competitive advantage lies in ease of use (single photo upload), clear pricing, and integration with popular social media formats. Revenue is generated through credit pack sales, appealing to casual users and content creators alike. The absence of subscription lowers entry barriers. The site is supported by a network of partner sites that enhance visibility and credibility. The business model is lean and focused, with potential for expansion into other AI video templates. Target customers are digitally savvy individuals interested in personalized AI content. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining up-to-date privacy compliance and expanding direct contact channels to enhance customer trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks of common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response plan and absence of dedicated security contact emails represent gaps in transparency and readiness. The site does not currently provide a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could be beneficial for responsible vulnerability management. Privacy compliance is partial, with no visible cookie consent mechanism despite GDPR indications. Overall, the security posture is strong technically but could be improved with better policy documentation and user-facing transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure full GDPR compliance and user awareness.
  2. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer or legal section.
  3. Add dedicated security contact emails (e.g., security@ozilaigoal.com, abuse@ozilaigoal.com) to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident communication.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible security research and transparency.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by providing verified company emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ozil Goal AI
Description
Ozil Goal AI is an online multimedia application that allows users to create AI-generated vertical videos recreating Mesut Özil's iconic 2016 goal against Ludogorets from a single photo. The service offers various AI models and video lengths, with a credit-based pricing system and no subscription.
Key services
AI video generation from a single photo, Multiple AI model options, Credit pack sales, Video customization (length, resolution)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (JSX runtime), Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, WebP images, MP4 video streaming
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web browsers
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure file upload inputs with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a niche AI video generation service based on a viral football goal trend.
  2. Content is well-structured with comprehensive FAQs, guides, and pricing transparency.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR compliance claims.
  5. Multiple partner badges and external references enhance trustworthiness.
  6. Modern tech stack with React and privacy-conscious analytics (Plausible).
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based frontend with modular JavaScript assets and optimized media delivery using WebP images and MP4 videos. It leverages Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking, balancing functionality and privacy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with efficient resource loading and minimal blocking scripts. No CMS or third-party heavy frameworks were detected, indicating a custom-built solution. Hosting details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. Technical risks are minimal, though ongoing monitoring of third-party scripts and dependencies is recommended to mitigate future vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ozilaigoal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ozilaigoal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.