Skip to main content

Security report for raindancemaker.com

Raindance Maker · Technology

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Email security.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raindance Maker operates a niche AI-powered video generation platform that transforms two photos into a themed AI video with soundtrack inclusion. The service targets content creators and social media users interested in creative AI video content, leveraging modern AI models like Seedance 2.5 and MiniMax H3. The platform is well-positioned in the AI creative tools market with a credit-based monetization model and subscription plans. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React and Tailwind CSS, ensuring fast performance, mobile responsiveness, and good accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite using tracking scripts. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
90/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.raindancemaker.com, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.raindancemaker.com, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@raindancemaker.com" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raindancemaker.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
50
Email security
72
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
90
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business focuses on a specialized AI video generation niche, capitalizing on a viral trend with a unique product offering. Its credit-based pricing and subscription plans indicate a SaaS revenue model targeting regular and casual creators. The presence of multiple featured external domains suggests active marketing and partnership efforts. The company maintains consistent branding and provides comprehensive user guides and FAQs, enhancing user trust and engagement. However, the absence of direct contact information and security incident channels may limit enterprise trust. The business appears small but focused, with potential for growth in the AI creative tools sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure input controls. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. The absence of explicit contact channels for security incidents may hinder timely response. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms despite tracking usage. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving user transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raindance Maker
Description
Raindance Maker offers an AI video generator that creates Raindance AI videos from two separate photos. Users can select roles, video duration, AI model (Seedance 2.5 or MiniMax H3), resolution, and receive a finished MP4 video including the reference soundtrack. The service requires no filming or prompt writing.
Key services
AI video generation from photos, Multiple AI models for video rendering, Credit-based pricing and subscription plans, Reference soundtrack inclusion
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Plausible Analytics, Google Identity Services
Frameworks
React, Tailwind CSS (implied by utility classes)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure file upload inputs with accept attribute

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Google Identity Services
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a specialized AI video generation service with clear user guidance.
  2. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. No visible cookie consent mechanism despite tracking usage.
  5. Multiple external partner and featured domains indicate good market presence.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. Good use of modern web technologies and responsive design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and performant tech stack including React and Tailwind CSS, with module preloading and optimized asset delivery. It integrates Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused tracking and Google Identity Services for authentication. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. SEO is enhanced by comprehensive meta tags and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting details are not explicit but performance indicators suggest a reliable provider. Technical risks are minimal, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is advised to mitigate supply chain risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raindancemaker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raindancemaker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.