Skip to main content

Security report for yottaa.com

Yottaa · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yottaa, Inc. is a technology company specializing in web performance optimization and security solutions tailored primarily for e-commerce businesses and online retailers. Their platform focuses on enhancing shopper journey speed, stability, and security by optimizing third-party scripts, CDN delivery, and security performance. The company positions itself as a key player in the web performance optimization market with a medium-sized enterprise footprint and a professional digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor, supported by a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and HubSpot for marketing and analytics. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, fast performance, and good SEO practices. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, though a dedicated security policy and incident response information are not publicly available. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is common for technology companies but slightly reduces transparency. The website maintains comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and secure, with moderate user tracking and advertising transparency. Strategically, Yottaa should enhance its security posture by publishing explicit security and incident response policies and consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to further build trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain staging.yottaa.com points to unregistered service dpu-load-balancer-1544281335.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yottaa.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yottaa operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions for web performance and security optimization targeted at e-commerce and retail sectors. Their business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on improving online shopper experiences to drive revenue. The company leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics platforms to support marketing efforts. Their market position is solid with a focus on innovation in third-party script management and CDN optimization. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, active social media presence, and comprehensive policy disclosures. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their SaaS platform. Target customers are medium to large online retailers seeking to improve website speed and security. The company’s partnership ecosystem includes major ad networks and analytics providers, enhancing their market reach and service integration.

Security posture

Yottaa demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. The website does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content and uses secure form handling via HubSpot. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting external security collaboration. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR, supported by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of public information. The security culture is implied to be professional but could be improved by publishing explicit security governance documents and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Include contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security team to enhance trust and regulatory compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures by detailing data retention policies and user rights more explicitly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Yottaa, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yottaa
Description
Yottaa keeps every shopper journey fast, stable, and secure – optimizing everything from third-party scripts to CDN and security performance.
Key services
Web performance optimization, Third-party script management, Content Delivery Network (CDN) optimization, Security performance enhancement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Crazy Egg, HubSpot, NitroPack, Elementor
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Crazy Egg, HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is business-focused and professionally presented
  3. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response page found
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging a modern and performant tech stack including NitroPack for optimization. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and HubSpot, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is fast with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. The use of security headers and HTTPS indicates strong baseline security. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits full infrastructure transparency. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security documentation and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100 +3Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 71/100 +10Medium31 findingsView report
  3. 61/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yottaa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yottaa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.