Skip to main content

Security report for yieldguild.io

Yield Guild Games · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yield Guild Games operates as a prominent Web 3 gaming guild, facilitating play-to-earn opportunities and community engagement within the metaverse. The company leverages blockchain technology to enable users to participate in digital asset management and gaming rewards. Their market position is strong, supported by reputable investors and media coverage, positioning them as a leader in the emerging Web 3 gaming sector. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted likely on Vercel, and integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools like PostHog and HubSpot. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure third-party services, but lacks visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms, indicating areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common in crypto-related businesses but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with moderate risk primarily related to privacy transparency and cookie compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yieldguild.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yield Guild Games targets the niche market of Web 3 gamers and crypto enthusiasts, offering a play-to-earn guild model that manages digital assets and rewards. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive partnerships with top-tier investors and media presence, which enhances credibility and market reach. The business model revolves around community-driven gaming and asset management, generating revenue through digital asset appreciation and guild participation. Growth indicators include active community engagement, frequent updates, and new game integrations. The partnership ecosystem is robust, including blockchain platforms, venture capital firms, and media outlets. Strategic observations suggest continued expansion into new Web 3 games and increased reward opportunities to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The security posture of Yield Guild Games is solid but not exhaustive. The website uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. Integration with trusted third-party services like HubSpot and PostHog indicates a mature approach to data collection and marketing. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and transparency in incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet compliance standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yield Guild Games
Description
Yield Guild Games is a collective focused on connecting people to play, earn, and win in Web 3 games while building lifelong friendships. They explore the best games in Web 3 and provide opportunities for play-to-earn and guild participation.
Key services
Web 3 game access and guild management, Digital asset management, Reward tracking and distribution, Community building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Three.js, Google Tag Manager, PostHog analytics, HubSpot forms, Vercel Speed Insights
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure third-party services (HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, PostHog)

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms, PostHog analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration transparency.
  3. Strong presence of reputable partners and media mentions.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Privacy and terms of use pages are present and accessible.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; server headers not provided for full analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging server-side rendering and static generation for performance. Hosting appears to be on Vercel, a cloud platform optimized for Next.js applications. The site uses Three.js for graphical elements and integrates analytics via PostHog and Google Tag Manager. Marketing automation is handled through HubSpot forms. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags properly configured. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Technical risks are minimal but include potential gaps in security headers and cookie compliance. The site is well-maintained with no visible broken elements or errors.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yieldguild.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yieldguild.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.