Skip to main content

Security report for yeswehack.com

YesWeHack · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

YesWeHack operates as a global bug bounty and vulnerability management platform, connecting organizations with a large community of vetted ethical hackers to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities. The company positions itself as a leader in crowdsourced security testing, offering a suite of services including bug bounty programs, vulnerability disclosure policies, pentest management, and attack surface management. Their business model emphasizes pay-for-results and scalable security testing tailored to organizational needs. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with integrations for marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and include consent mechanisms, indicating attention to regulatory compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs multiple security headers, and integrates secure forms via HubSpot. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a security.txt file and explicit incident response contact information are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable in the provided raw output, which slightly impacts transparency but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the professional content and trust signals. Overall, YesWeHack demonstrates a strong security posture, a professional and user-friendly web presence, and a credible business model in the cybersecurity domain. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency with public security contact channels and maintaining vigilance on third-party script security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yeswehack.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention yeswehack.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,206
Employees
2
Customers
4,200
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for yeswehack.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.yeswehack.com2026-05-25
  • –mail.yeswehack.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

YesWeHack holds a strong market position as a global platform for crowdsourced security testing, leveraging a large community of ethical hackers. Their competitive advantage lies in their pay-for-results model and comprehensive vulnerability management offerings. The company targets organizations of various sizes seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture through scalable and cost-effective testing solutions. Partnerships with platforms like Gartner and career portals indicate a robust ecosystem and growth orientation. The presence of customer testimonials and case studies further supports their credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, robust security headers, and secure data collection practices. Privacy and cookie policies align with GDPR requirements, and consent mechanisms are implemented. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security.txt file and incident response contact details limits transparency in vulnerability reporting and incident handling. No critical vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were identified in the website content. Continued monitoring and enhancement of third-party integrations and explicit incident response channels are recommended to maintain and improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Update WHOIS information to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
YesWeHack
Description
YesWeHack is a global Bug Bounty & Vulnerability Management Platform connecting organizations with tens of thousands of ethical hackers worldwide to uncover vulnerabilities in websites, mobile apps, connected devices, and digital infrastructure.
Key services
Bug Bounty Programs, Vulnerability Disclosure Policy (VDP), Pentest Management, Attack Surface Management, Live Hacking Events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, CookieYes, DOMPurify
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Factors.ai
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on bug bounty and vulnerability management services.
  3. Multiple trust signals including customer testimonials and partner logos.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No exposed sensitive information or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which slightly reduces transparency but does not indicate fraud.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging Sanity.io as a CMS. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing Ads. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility features. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks and CDN-hosted assets indicates a well-maintained technical infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve hosting provider transparency and to further optimize accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yeswehack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yeswehack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.