Skip to main content

Security report for yanzinetworks.com

Yanzi · Technology · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yanzi is a technology company specializing in IoT sensors and smart building solutions, now integrated as part of Spica Connect and under the parent company Nordomatic. Their offerings focus on providing scalable, secure, and easy-to-use sensor systems and cloud-based management tools for corporate clients managing smart buildings and workplaces globally. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content about their products and services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the X Theme framework and includes modern web technologies and analytics tools, though performance is moderate and accessibility is basic. Security posture shows strengths in cryptography usage but lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, with no published security or privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yanzinetworks.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yanzi operates in the technology sector with a focus on energy and smart building management. Their business model combines hardware IoT sensors with cloud software services, targeting large corporate clients and enterprises. The company leverages its relationship with Nordomatic and Spica to expand its market reach and integrate complementary solutions. The website indicates a medium-sized company with a global footprint, emphasizing scalability and security as competitive advantages. Partnerships with companies like EcoPilot and the use of support and documentation portals suggest a mature ecosystem. Growth indicators include sensor sales and data points processed daily, highlighting operational scale. The absence of explicit founding year or detailed company registration data limits deeper business profiling.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. The company claims use of strong, FIPS-140 compliant cryptography for devices and cloud communications, which is a positive indicator for product security. However, the website itself lacks critical security headers and does not explicitly confirm HTTPS usage in the provided HTML content, which could expose users to risks. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or vulnerability disclosure, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and best security practices. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, reducing transparency and readiness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the lack of security documentation and policies is a concern for risk management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with valid SSL certificates and update all URLs accordingly.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security contact information to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yanzi
Description
Yanzi provides simple, scalable, and secure sensors for smart buildings and workplaces, now part of Spica Connect, focusing on smart tech for places and people with cloud-based building and energy management solutions.
Key services
IoT sensors for smart buildings, Cloud-based building and energy management, Workplace experience applications, Building analytics and alerts, Service request management, Access control integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Cornerstone plugin, The Grid plugin, X Theme, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, X Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of FIPS-140 compliant cryptography mentioned for devices and cloud
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
GatorLeads
Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
GatorLeads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to a contact page; no emails or phone numbers explicitly listed.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with X Theme and several plugins.
  5. Security best practices partially implemented but missing key headers and HTTPS confirmation.
  6. Marketing and analytics tools include Google Analytics, Plausible, and GatorLeads tracking.
  7. Business is part of Nordomatic group, focusing on IoT sensors and smart building solutions.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No data protection officer or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the X Theme framework, supported by plugins such as Cornerstone and The Grid for content and layout management. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Plausible, with additional marketing tracking from GatorLeads. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but only basic accessibility and SEO features. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. The site includes multiple external domains for support, documentation, and partner services, indicating a connected ecosystem.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yanzinetworks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yanzinetworks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.