Skip to main content

Security report for xprint-media.eu

Xprint media · Technology · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

57/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Xprint Media is a small design studio based in Latvia specializing in website development, graphic design, branding, and print design services. The website is primarily in Russian with an English version available, targeting businesses and individuals seeking professional digital and print design solutions. The company showcases a portfolio of completed projects, indicating active business operations and a focus on quality service delivery. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS using the Helix Ultimate template framework, incorporating modern web fonts and social media integrations. Security measures include HTTPS encryption and Google reCAPTCHA on the contact form, though there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. Overall, the website presents a professional image with good content quality and user experience but lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xprint-media.eu

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
Average
57

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention xprint-media.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for xprint-media.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and media sectors, providing essential digital services such as web development and branding. Its business model revolves around service provision with a portfolio-driven approach to attract clients. The presence of multiple contact channels and social media links suggests active customer engagement. The website's market position appears to be that of a small but competent design studio catering to regional clients. There is no indication of parent companies or subsidiaries, and the company maintains a consistent brand identity across its digital presence. The lack of detailed business registration information limits deeper credibility assessment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking explicit GDPR adherence and no cookie consent mechanism. The contact form collects personal data but does not indicate secure handling or data retention policies. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and publish a comprehensive privacy policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements and data handling practices.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with EU cookie regulations and enhance user transparency.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security contact to facilitate responsible reporting and incident management.
  5. Regularly audit and update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Xprint media
Description
Дизайн студия Xprint media. Разработка сайтов любой сложности. Полиграфический дизайн.
Key services
website development, graphic design, branding, print design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla, Helix Ultimate template, Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Helix Ultimate
Platforms
Joomla CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Chaty
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with language switch to English available.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed with multiple channels.
  4. No explicit cookie or terms of service policies found.
  5. Uses Joomla CMS with Helix Ultimate template framework.
  6. Includes Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on contact form.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Skype, WhatsApp, Telegram, and Issuu.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
  10. Privacy policy is present but basic and not clearly GDPR compliant.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with the Helix Ultimate template, leveraging Google Fonts and Facebook SDK for enhanced user experience and social integration. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and marketing tracking, alongside a third-party chat tracking pixel. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format for organization and website schema. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and optimized CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced hosting details or CDN usage. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xprint-media.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xprint-media.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.