Skip to main content

Security report for xp.network

XP.NETWORK Ltd. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

XP.NETWORK Ltd. operates a leading multichain NFT bridging platform that enables seamless transfer of NFTs and fungible tokens across multiple blockchains. The company offers a suite of products including a multichain bridge, bridge widget, explorer, staking platform, and APIs, targeting NFT projects, marketplaces, and gaming ecosystems. Their market position is strong with numerous blockchain integrations and ecosystem partnerships, supported by a mature domain and active GitHub repository. Technically, the website is well-implemented using modern web technologies, with fast performance, mobile optimization, and good SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, Cloudflare DNS, and reCAPTCHA, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy is published. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xp.network

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

XP.NETWORK is positioned as a key player in the NFT interoperability space, offering technology solutions that facilitate cross-chain NFT and token transfers. Their business model revolves around providing bridging infrastructure, developer APIs, and staking services, appealing to NFT creators, dApps, and blockchain communities. The company demonstrates growth through extensive blockchain integrations (195+), foundation grants, and a large ecosystem of partners and testimonials. Their open-source presence on GitHub with significant codebase size indicates active development. The company targets a global audience with a focus on Web3 innovation and NFT market expansion.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS services, enhancing availability and security. Security best practices include client-side input validation and Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site lacks a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could improve security maturity and community trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
XP.NETWORK Ltd.
Description
XP.NETWORK provides a multichain NFT bridge enabling seamless NFT and fungible token transfers across multiple blockchains, supporting NFT dApps, marketplaces, and gaming ecosystems.
Key services
Multichain NFT Bridge, Bridge Widget, Bridge Explorer, XPJS API, Staking Platform, Fungible Token Bridge
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • Client-side input validation on forms
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive NFT bridging platform with multiple live products
  2. Strong ecosystem and partner testimonials
  3. Good technical implementation with modern stack and security practices
  4. Lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  6. Domain uses privacy protection but is longstanding and consistent
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Bootstrap framework, ensuring responsive and accessible design. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices. Use of Google reCAPTCHA enhances form security. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. The technical implementation is robust with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and formalize security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xp.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xp.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.