Skip to main content

Security report for xlogin.us

NameCheap, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

XLogin is a technology company specializing in providing an antidetect browser solution that enables users to create secure, isolated browser profiles with unique fingerprints. Their service targets businesses and professionals who require multi-account management and browser fingerprint protection, offering features such as browser automation and team workflow management. The company operates on a subscription-based model with tiered pricing and a free trial to attract new users. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery, and leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing purposes. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies, indicating room for improvement. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, registered with NameCheap in the US since 2020. Overall, the website is professional and functional with moderate security and privacy compliance levels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xlogin.us

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

XLogin occupies a niche market in browser fingerprint protection and multi-account management tools, catering primarily to digital marketers, affiliate marketers, e-commerce operators, and professionals requiring anonymity and automation. Their competitive advantage lies in offering isolated browser environments with fingerprint replacement technology and automation capabilities. Revenue streams are subscription-based with multiple pricing tiers and a free trial to encourage adoption. The company has established a broad partnership ecosystem with numerous proxy service providers, enhancing its service offerings. Growth indicators include a clear pricing structure, multilingual support, and integration with automation tools. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security posture and privacy compliance to strengthen market trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable hosting and DNS providers, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is published, and there is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is basic, with no cookie consent mechanism or explicit GDPR compliance statements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of security best practices documentation and cookie consent reduces the overall security posture. Business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory non-compliance and reduced user trust. Enhancing security policies, headers, and privacy mechanisms is recommended to improve security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit GDPR compliance information to improve privacy compliance.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NameCheap, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NameCheap, Inc.
Description
XLogin provides an antidetect browser that creates secure browser profiles with distinct fingerprints for running unlimited accounts. It offers multiple fingerprint protection against detection and supports business workflow automation and browser automation.
Key services
Antidetect browser profiles, Browser fingerprinting protection, Browser automation via Selenium, Team workflow and profile sharing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear business offerings and pricing
  2. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found
  3. Multiple proxy partner links indicate ecosystem integration
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance indicators
  5. Security headers not detected in HTML content
  6. Uses modern frontend libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  7. No visible security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta keywords and description tags. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of advanced security headers and missing privacy compliance features. Opportunities exist to modernize accessibility and SEO practices and to strengthen security configurations to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xlogin.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xlogin.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.