Skip to main content

Security report for xingloo.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.xingloo.com presents itself as a provider of cross-border e-commerce acceleration solutions, focusing on live streaming optimization and network performance enhancements. The business targets e-commerce enterprises and live streamers seeking stable, low-latency network services for overseas markets. The site uses modern web technologies such as React and integrates multiple analytics platforms including Google Analytics, Baidu, and CNZZ, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the visible content is minimal, primarily metadata and script references, with no visible textual content or contact information on the homepage. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS enforcement details, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks critical compliance and trust indicators, limiting its credibility and security assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xingloo.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention xingloo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for xingloo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically providing network acceleration services tailored for cross-border e-commerce and live streaming platforms such as TikTok. Its market positioning is niche, focusing on network optimization for overseas live commerce. The business model likely revolves around subscription or service fees for network acceleration solutions. The absence of detailed company information, contact details, or certifications limits visibility into its operational scale and partnerships. The use of multiple Chinese analytics services suggests a primary focus on Chinese-speaking markets or origins. Growth potential exists given the increasing demand for cross-border e-commerce solutions, but transparency and trust-building measures are needed to enhance market confidence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL) but lacks visible security headers and policies. No forms or user input fields were detected, reducing immediate attack surface, but also limiting user engagement. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The missing WHOIS data is a significant trust concern. Overall, the site requires improvements in security best practices, transparency, and compliance to reduce risk and build user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and verify via external scans.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Publish contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve credibility.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Conduct a WHOIS registration audit to ensure domain legitimacy and update WHOIS records accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
星鹿跨境电商加速盒官网，全球节点覆盖，智能跨境专线+静态住宅IP，稳定高效、超低延迟，一站式解决跨境网络问题，为跨境业务量身定制，无需复杂配置，即插即用。
Key services
全球节点覆盖, 智能跨境专线, 静态住宅IP, 网络稳定高效加速
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React (implied by chunk.js and root div), Google Analytics (gtag.js), Baidu Analytics (hm.js), CNZZ Analytics (z.js), AIHECONG chat widget
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
CNZZ, Baidu Analytics, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CNZZ, Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
AIHECONG chat widget
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full HTML content and no WAF blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts from Chinese and global providers.
  5. No forms or user input fields detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website content is minimal and mostly metadata and scripts with a React app root div but no visible textual content in the HTML snapshot.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  9. No social media links or business certifications found.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, indicated by chunked CSS and JS files and a root div for the app. It integrates multiple analytics scripts from Chinese and global providers, which may impact user privacy. The site lacks visible CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tags present but no explicit accessibility features detected. SEO is basic, with meta keywords and description but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No forms or interactive elements were found, limiting data collection and user engagement capabilities. The technical stack is modern but underutilized in terms of content richness and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xingloo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xingloo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.