Skip to main content

Security report for xdcscan.io

Cloudflare, Inc · Technology · India

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OpenScan.ai operates as a blockchain explorer dedicated to the XDC Network, providing users with comprehensive tools to explore transactions, addresses, tokens, NFTs, and DeFi activities. The platform targets blockchain users, developers, and investors interested in the XDC ecosystem. It offers a range of services including transaction tracking, token analytics, contract verification, and developer APIs, positioning itself as a niche but important player in the blockchain data services market. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as React.js and Bootstrap, hosted and registered via Cloudflare, ensuring a reliable and secure infrastructure. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization, with a clean and professional design that facilitates user navigation and engagement. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS enforcement, strong security headers, and domain transfer protections. However, it lacks publicly available privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for regulatory compliance and user trust. Overall, OpenScan.ai presents a solid technical and business foundation with moderate security maturity. To enhance trust and compliance, it should implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, provide clear contact and incident response channels, and enable DNSSEC for improved DNS security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching xdcscan.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OpenScan.ai serves a specialized market segment within the blockchain industry, focusing on the XDC Network. Its competitive advantage lies in offering detailed blockchain data and analytics tailored to this network, supported by developer-friendly APIs and contract verification tools. The business model appears to be service-oriented, potentially monetizing through API plans and value-added blockchain data services. The platform's partnerships with related blockchain projects and presence on social media channels like Twitter and Telegram indicate active community engagement and ecosystem integration. Growth indicators include a relatively recent domain registration and expanding service offerings such as DeFi and NFT tracking.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled, robust security headers, and domain transfer restrictions. The use of Cloudflare for DNS and registrar services adds an additional layer of security and reliability. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of a vulnerability disclosure program, and missing incident response contact details represent compliance and operational gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from implementing DNSSEC and publishing security policies to improve transparency and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to address GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cloudflare, Inc
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloudflare, Inc
Description
OpenScan.ai allows you to explore and search the blockchain for transactions, addresses, tokens, prices and other activities taking place on XDC Network (XDC).
Key services
Blockchain transaction search, Token and NFT tracking, Market price and statistics, Developer APIs, Contract verification, DeFi and DEX tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React.js, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Highcharts, Cloudflare DNS and registrar
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and registrar

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a blockchain explorer focused on XDC Network
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. No explicit contact or security incident response information available
  4. Use of modern web technologies and Cloudflare infrastructure
  5. No WAF blocking or challenge detected
  6. Contains multiple external links to partner and related blockchain services
  7. Advertising banners present but no major ad networks or trackers detected
  8. Good SSL and security headers configuration
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React.js framework with Bootstrap for responsive design and Highcharts for data visualization. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and domain registration, ensuring reliable hosting and security features. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic but includes essential meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by enabling DNSSEC and improving privacy compliance. The infrastructure supports scalability and integration with blockchain data sources effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with xdcscan.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review xdcscan.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.