Skip to main content

Security report for wwwinter.co.uk

W.W.Winter Ltd. · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

W.W.Winter Ltd. is a longstanding family-run photography business based in Derbyshire, UK, with a heritage dating back to 1852. The company offers portraiture, copy and restoration, picture framing, and passport/profile photography services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image emphasizing its historical significance and trusted local reputation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and Yoast SEO plugin, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and copy protection scripts, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is limited, with no privacy or terms of service pages and no explicit cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, including phone, email, and social media channels. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned for its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 18 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wwwinter.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business leverages its unique market position as the UK's oldest photography studio to attract local families and individuals seeking professional photography services. Its business model focuses on personalized, heritage-rich services including portraiture and restoration. The company maintains a partnership with the W.W. Winter Heritage Trust to preserve its legacy. The website supports customer engagement through testimonials and a portfolio, indicating a customer-centric approach. Growth potential lies in digital marketing and expanding online presence. The absence of e-commerce or online booking suggests a traditional service delivery model. Strategic partnerships and community involvement strengthen brand loyalty.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and actively uses scripts to prevent content copying, indicating a focus on protecting intellectual property. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy or incident response information limits transparency and preparedness perception. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting standard web security best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add standard HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance security.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Review and optimize copy protection scripts to balance security with user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
W.W.Winter Ltd.
Description
Winter’s studio is the longest running photography business in Britain. A friendly, family run studio trusted by generations of Derby families. Services include portraiture, copy & restoration, picture framing, passports & profiles.
Key services
Portraiture, Copy & Restoration, Picture Framing, Passports & Profiles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Flatsome theme, jQuery, Flickity slider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content copy protection scripts active
  • Disabling right-click and text selection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based family photography business site with heritage branding
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie notice present but no explicit consent mechanism
  4. Contact info includes phone and email in footer and contact form present
  5. Content copy protection scripts active, disabling right-click and selection
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter
  7. Good SEO metadata and structured data via Yoast SEO
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  9. No security policy or incident response info published
  10. Website is accessible with no WAF blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform with a popular commercial theme (Flatsome) and SEO plugin (Yoast). It uses jQuery and Flickity for UI components. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some prefetching of scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. No major technical debt is evident, but security headers and privacy compliance features are missing. Hosting appears stable with domain registration via Ionos SE.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wwwinter.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wwwinter.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.