Skip to main content

Security report for wtz.io

Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WTZ is a technology-focused DeFi project offering a fully fungible FA2 token collateralized by Tezos (XTZ). The website presents a modern, Vue.js-based interface allowing users to mint and swap WTZ tokens seamlessly. The project targets DeFi users and blockchain developers within the Tezos ecosystem, positioning itself as a niche wrapped token solution. Technically, the site uses contemporary web technologies and offers a responsive design with moderate performance. However, security posture is moderate due to lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of privacy and cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and trust. The domain is privacy protected but has a mature registration date consistent with the project's age. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wtz.io

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WTZ operates in the blockchain and DeFi sector, focusing on wrapped tokens for the Tezos ecosystem. Its business model revolves around token issuance and facilitating DeFi transactions with minimal slippage. The project appears small but established since 2016, with a clear target audience of crypto users and developers. The partnership with Codecrafting Labs indicates a professional development approach. Revenue streams likely include token-related fees or DeFi service facilitation. The lack of public contact or compliance documentation may hinder broader adoption. The project occupies a specialized niche with potential for growth as DeFi expands on Tezos.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security or privacy policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could delay response to security events. The lack of contact information further reduces the ability to report or manage incidents. While no critical vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content, the site should improve transparency and implement standard security headers and policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts and general support.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
WTZ is an FA2 token fully collateralized by XTZ (Tezos), fully fungible, designed for DeFi applications. It offers a wrapped version of Tezos that can be swapped back without slippage or loss, enabling use in dapps and protocols across the Tezos ecosystem.
Key services
Minting WTZ tokens, Swapping between XTZ and WTZ, Providing an FA2 compatible wrapped Tezos token
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers provided
  3. Site uses modern JavaScript framework Vue.js
  4. Domain uses privacy protection service
  5. No DNSSEC enabled
  6. No visible security headers in HTML
  7. Site content is focused on DeFi wrapped token for Tezos blockchain
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
  10. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and uses FontAwesome for icons. The site loads JavaScript chunks and CSS efficiently, indicating a modular build. The domain is registered via NameCheap with privacy protection. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wtz.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wtz.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.