Skip to main content

Security report for wprssaggregator.com

WP RSS Aggregator · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WP RSS Aggregator is a specialized technology company offering a leading WordPress plugin for RSS feed aggregation and content curation. The company targets WordPress site owners, bloggers, and content curators seeking to automate and enhance content import and display. With over 50,000 users and strong trust indicators including high user ratings and institutional clients, WP RSS Aggregator holds a solid market position in the WordPress plugin ecosystem. The website is professionally designed, SEO optimized, and provides comprehensive product information and support resources. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Matomo, Drip, and Sleeknote, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS, security headers, and anonymized analytics, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are absent. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trustworthiness but does not detract from the overall professional presentation. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies and verifying domain registration details to enhance credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wprssaggregator.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WP RSS Aggregator operates a SaaS business model centered on plugin sales and premium extensions with support services. The company leverages a niche in content aggregation for WordPress, providing key features like feed-to-post import, display templates, keyword filtering, and automation. Its target customers are content creators and site owners who benefit from streamlined content curation. The company demonstrates growth and market acceptance with a large user base and endorsements from reputable institutions. The website's integration of affiliate programs and marketing tools indicates a well-developed partnership and revenue ecosystem. However, the lack of visible company registration or VAT information suggests a small-sized entity focused on digital product delivery. The business maintains consistent branding and high-quality content, supporting strong user trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and privacy-conscious analytics configurations. Form tracking is implemented securely with event-based analytics, and no sensitive data exposure was detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness perception. DNSSEC is not indicated, which could be an area for improvement. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WP RSS Aggregator
Description
WP RSS Aggregator is the top rated plugin for importing RSS feeds into your WordPress sites. Easy-to-use, awesome support and best-in-class flexibility.
Key services
RSS feed aggregation, Feed to post import, Display templates, Keyword filtering, Automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Elementor, Easy Digital Downloads, Google Analytics, Matomo, Drip, Sleeknote
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • Form tracking with event-based analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Fathom Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Drip, Fathom Analytics, MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
Sleeknote, Drip
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and focused on WordPress RSS aggregation.
  3. Multiple trusted analytics and marketing tools are integrated.
  4. No explicit or adult content detected; suitable for general audiences.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a business website.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. Contact information is available via contact form and email.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  9. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and Elementor builder.
  10. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Easy Digital Downloads for e-commerce functionality. It integrates advanced analytics tools including Google Analytics, Matomo, Fathom Analytics, and Drip for marketing automation. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, and mobile responsiveness is well implemented. Accessibility features are present, enhancing usability. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and formalize security-related documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wprssaggregator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wprssaggregator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.