Skip to main content

Security report for wprediscache.com

Rhubarb Tech Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Object Cache Pro is a specialized technology company offering a premium Redis object cache backend plugin for WordPress. The company positions itself as a high-performance, reliable, and customizable solution with dedicated engineering support, targeting WordPress site owners and hosting providers. The website demonstrates strong branding, detailed product features, and endorsements from reputable partners, indicating a solid market presence in the WordPress caching niche. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.1, uses Cloudflare DNS, and integrates modern tools like Intercom and Google Analytics. However, the website suffers from a critical security misconfiguration with an invalid or missing SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support despite HSTS being enabled. This significantly impacts the security posture and user trust. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service found. Contact information is not directly available, which may affect user confidence. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wprediscache.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a subscription-based SaaS model focused on WordPress caching technology, leveraging Redis for object caching. It targets a niche market of WordPress developers, site owners, and hosting providers, supported by partnerships with major hosting companies. The business emphasizes performance, reliability, and premium support, which are key competitive advantages. The presence of detailed feature comparisons and customer testimonials suggests a mature marketing strategy. The domain age and registration details align well with the business timeline, enhancing legitimacy. The company appears small but focused, with no subsidiaries or complex corporate structure evident. The use of Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services indicates a modern infrastructure approach.

Security posture

The security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability for any modern website, especially one offering software products. While HSTS is enabled with preload, this is undermined by the SSL misconfiguration. No DNSSEC is implemented, and no advanced security headers beyond HSTS are detected. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of known vulnerabilities, but the lack of secure transport puts users at risk. No incident response or security policy pages are found, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The site uses reputable third-party services but should improve its own security hygiene urgently.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Add clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility and user support.
  4. Publish terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user rights and security commitments.
  5. Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  6. Consider enabling DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  7. Implement an incident response page or contact channel for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress version with a clean and professional design. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, which provides performance and security benefits. The tech stack includes PHP versions 7.2 to 8.4 support and Redis caching technology. The site integrates Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Intercom for user engagement and analytics. However, the page load time is slow (12.7 seconds) and the page size is large (about 500 KB), indicating potential optimization opportunities. Accessibility and SEO are basic to good but could be improved with better mobile optimization and accessibility features. The lack of a valid SSL certificate is a major technical flaw that impacts security and user trust. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but requires performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wprediscache.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wprediscache.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.