Skip to main content

Security report for wpproatozhost.com

WP Pro A to Z Host · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WP Pro A to Z Host is a small Canadian-based web hosting provider specializing in high-quality, fast WordPress hosting services. Founded in 2023, the company offers a range of hosting solutions including shared hosting, website backups via CodeGuard, SEO tools from Marketgoo, SSL certificates, and professional email services through OpenXchange. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content targeting WordPress users and small to medium businesses. Technically, the site is built on WHMCS with a Lagom template, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for user interaction and security. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and compliance mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpproatozhost.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche WordPress hosting provider with complementary professional services, leveraging partnerships with related WordPress development and support entities. Its business model focuses on recurring revenue from hosting plans and add-on services such as backups, SEO, and SSL certificates. The target market includes WordPress site owners seeking reliable and fast hosting with additional support options. The presence of partner domains and integration with established services like Microsoft 365 suggests a growing ecosystem. The company is relatively new but shows signs of strategic partnerships and a clear service offering that differentiates it in a competitive hosting market.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain status flags protect against unauthorized domain changes. Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate spam on forms. However, the absence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options limits protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and trust. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a potential vulnerability in DNS integrity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hosting provider but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WP Pro A to Z Host
Description
High quality fast WordPress web hosting. All the speed you need.
Key services
WordPress web hosting, Shared hosting, CodeGuard website backup, Marketgoo SEO tools, SSL certificates, Professional email (OpenXchange), WordPress support and maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Lagom (WHMCS template)
Platforms
WHMCS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc. to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress hosting provider with additional services.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and service offerings.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may impact compliance.
  4. Security headers are minimal; opportunity to improve security posture exists.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WHMCS platform using the Lagom template, indicating a mature hosting billing and management system. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and spam prevention. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is appropriate for the business model but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features. Hosting provider details are limited but the domain registrar is reputable. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpproatozhost.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpproatozhost.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.