Skip to main content

Security report for wpj.cz

wpj s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

wpj s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in professional e-commerce solutions, including custom e-shop creation and graphic design. The company positions itself as a provider of advanced, original design and a proprietary e-commerce system, targeting businesses seeking to elevate their online sales platforms. The website demonstrates a strong market presence with multiple industry awards and a portfolio of notable clients, indicating a reputable position in the e-commerce development sector. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript frameworks, Typekit fonts, Lottie animations, and integrates advanced tracking and error monitoring tools like Google Tag Manager and Sentry. The site is mobile-optimized and features good SEO practices, although explicit CMS or hosting details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with a professional and responsive design enhancing user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available privacy or terms of service documents, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness, although the website content and branding suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration, enhanced security headers, and published privacy and legal policies to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of wpj.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpj.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the e-commerce sector, providing tailored online shop solutions and graphic design services. Its business model focuses on service provision to other businesses, leveraging proprietary technology and design expertise. The presence of multiple awards and a diverse client portfolio suggests competitive advantages in quality and innovation. The target customers are businesses aiming to upgrade or establish e-commerce platforms. The company maintains active social media channels, supporting marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include recent news articles and project showcases. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent medium-sized enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of error tracking and monitoring tools. The cookie consent mechanism indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could be improved with better policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
wpj s.r.o.
Description
Vytvoříme Vám profesionální e-shop nebo grafiku dle vašich požadavků.
Key services
E-shop creation, Graphic design, Custom e-commerce system development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typekit fonts, Lottie animations, Google Tag Manager, Sentry error tracking, SupportBox chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Sentry error tracking with filtering
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  5. Multiple social media channels are linked and active.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML content.
  8. HTTPS is used and appears properly configured.
  9. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools is evident.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. It integrates Typekit for fonts and Lottie for animations, enhancing visual appeal. Google Tag Manager is used for marketing and analytics management, alongside Microsoft Clarity and Facebook Pixel for user behavior tracking. Error monitoring is handled by Sentry with custom filters to reduce noise. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in script loading and caching. The technical stack is contemporary but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 74/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpj.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpj.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.