Skip to main content

Security report for wpii.dev

Internet Index Czech, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Internet Index Czech, s.r.o. operates the website wpii.dev, offering WP Integrity Inspector, a professional Windows OS tool designed to monitor the security and integrity of WordPress websites. The company has a decade of experience managing over a thousand WordPress sites and positions itself as a niche provider focused on WordPress security monitoring. Their business model includes software sales with subscription pricing and support services, targeting WordPress professionals and website administrators. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and professional content. However, no CMS is detected, and hosting details are not explicit. Performance is moderate with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and an open-source PHP connector for secure monitoring, ensuring data privacy. The company holds ISO 27001 certification, indicating a mature security posture. However, the site lacks visible security headers, a cookie consent mechanism, and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance with cookie consent, publishing incident response contacts, and implementing security headers to strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpii.dev

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is a small technology firm based in the Czech Republic specializing in WordPress security monitoring tools. Its competitive advantage lies in a decade of operational experience and managing a large portfolio of WordPress sites. Revenue streams come from subscription fees for domain monitoring and software downloads. The target customers are WordPress professionals and site owners concerned with security. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and support documentation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is good, supported by ISO 27001 certification and secure communication via an open-source PHP connector. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and lack of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information represent compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. Data protection practices appear sound, but privacy compliance could be improved with cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is not explicitly communicated, which could impact trust in security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve security communication.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website.
  4. Enhance privacy policy details with explicit data retention and processing information.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Internet Index Czech, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ05707218
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Internet Index Czech, s.r.o.
Description
Develops and provides WP Integrity Inspector, a professional Windows OS tool for monitoring the security and integrity of WordPress websites. The company also manages over a thousand WordPress websites.
Key services
WP Integrity Inspector software, Domain monitoring service, Support and documentation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Windows OS (target platform for software)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of PHP connector for secure monitoring
  • Open source connector for transparency

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus on WordPress security monitoring.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, which is a minor compliance gap.
  5. Clear company information including VAT number and location in Czech Republic.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  7. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and incident response info.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident, which could be areas for future transparency. The absence of some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates minor technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpii.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpii.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.