Skip to main content

Security report for wp-sms-pro.com

VeronaLabs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WP SMS Pro is a specialized WordPress plugin provider focusing on SMS messaging and notification services integrated with WooCommerce and other popular WordPress plugins. The company, VeronaLabs, offers a comprehensive solution supporting over 350 SMS gateways worldwide, targeting WordPress site owners and e-commerce businesses seeking reliable SMS communication. Their market position is strong within the niche, supported by extensive integrations and add-ons. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for security. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading and caching are implemented, providing a good user experience across devices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and some security best practices observed, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie consent mechanisms but lacks a visible privacy policy page. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with a domain registration consistent with the business history.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wp-sms-pro.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
35
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, providing a SaaS-like plugin product with multiple add-ons and integrations. Revenue streams likely include plugin sales, subscriptions, and add-on purchases. The target customers are WordPress and WooCommerce users needing SMS notification and verification services. The company maintains a professional online presence with social media engagement and a demo site. Their partnership ecosystem includes integration with major SMS gateways and popular WordPress plugins, enhancing their competitive advantage. Growth indicators include continuous updates and a broad gateway support network. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding security transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which could hinder trust and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR documentation and vulnerability disclosure. The security culture appears to be basic but functional, with opportunities to enhance transparency and proactive security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VeronaLabs
Description
WordPress and WooCommerce SMS Notification and OTP plugin, Integration with BuddyPress, GravityForms with Twilio, Plivo, Clickatell, Infobip, and Vonage Nexmo
Key services
WordPress SMS plugin, WooCommerce SMS notifications, OTP and phone verification, Integration with popular plugins and SMS gateways
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Cloudflare DNS, Burst cookieless tracking, WP Rocket (lazy loading scripts), Rank Math SEO plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit, Burst cookieless tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional WordPress plugin business with extensive integrations and add-ons.
  3. Strong SEO and structured data usage.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit privacy policy page.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce and several plugins for SEO, GDPR compliance, and analytics. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing DNS-level protection and performance benefits. Performance optimizations like lazy loading scripts and caching are in place, resulting in moderate to good loading speeds. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit security policies, which could impact long-term operational security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wp-sms-pro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wp-sms-pro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.