Skip to main content

Security report for wp-royal-themes.com

Wp Royal · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WP Royal is a small technology company specializing in the development and sale of WordPress themes, both free and premium, targeting WordPress users and developers. Established in 2012, the company maintains a niche market position with a focus on quality, customizable, and e-commerce compatible themes. Their website demonstrates a professional design with good navigation and content relevance, supported by customer reviews and active support forums. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and other popular plugins, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though lacking some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wp-royal-themes.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WP Royal operates in the WordPress theme development sector, leveraging a direct-to-customer sales model via their website and Freemius for license management. Their competitive advantage lies in offering both free and premium themes with comprehensive support and documentation. The company targets individual WordPress users, bloggers, and small businesses seeking customizable themes. The presence of social media channels and support forums indicates an engaged community and customer base. Revenue streams likely include theme sales and possibly support services. The partnership with Freemius enhances payment processing and license management capabilities. Growth indicators include regular theme updates and new releases. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy and security policies to enhance customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of popular and updated plugins like WooCommerce and Yoast SEO is positive but requires ongoing vigilance to avoid vulnerabilities. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the lack of a detailed privacy policy is a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wp Royal
Description
Crafting Best Wordpress Themes Since 2012
Key services
WordPress theme development, Theme support forums, Theme documentation and tutorials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google Analytics, Freemius Checkout
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WooCommerce and GDPR compliance plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Freemius Checkout
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based theme provider with a focus on premium and free themes.
  2. Uses multiple modern WordPress plugins and technologies for e-commerce and SEO.
  3. Includes customer reviews and active support forums indicating engagement.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and WPBakery Page Builder for content layout. It uses Google Fonts and CDN services for performance optimization. The presence of Freemius Checkout scripts indicates integration with a third-party license and payment management platform. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and responsive design features. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages, which are technical debt areas. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wp-royal-themes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wp-royal-themes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.