Skip to main content

Security report for worth.nl

Worth Internet Systems · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Worth Internet Systems is a Dutch digital transformation partner specializing in developing impactful digital products primarily for government, education, and corporate sectors. Their website demonstrates a strong market position with a focus on public value, agile methodologies, and cloud-native technologies. The company emphasizes open collaboration and continuous improvement of digital government services. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel and Azure, and uses TypeScript, Kubernetes, and Terraform for infrastructure management. Security posture is strong, evidenced by HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and ISO 27001 certification. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the site lacks explicit terms of service and incident response contact details. Overall, the website is professional, fast, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, reflecting a mature digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching worth.nl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention worth.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for worth.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Worth operates in the technology sector with a focus on government and education digital transformation. Their business model centers on providing agile teams, technology strategy, and product development services. The company leverages cloud-native technologies to deliver scalable and flexible solutions. Their market positioning is strong within the Dutch public sector, supported by certifications like ISO 27001 and detailed case studies showcasing successful projects. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The company demonstrates growth potential through partnerships and a clear focus on composable, MACH architecture. Their content quality and branding consistency reinforce their credibility and professionalism.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The presence of ISO 27001 certification indicates adherence to recognized information security management standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents an area for improvement. Overall, the security practices align well with industry standards for a technology service provider.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve inclusivity.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Worth Internet Systems
Description
Worth is a partner in realizing impactful digital products, supporting governments in digital transformation from idea to implementation. They focus on public value, open collaboration, and continuous improvement of digital government services.
Key services
Digital product development, Agile team composition, Technology strategy and implementation, Cloud-native solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, TypeScript, Node.js, Kubernetes, Microsoft Azure, Terraform
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • Use of modern frameworks with security in mind
  • ISO 27001 certification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadinfo
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (implied via GTM), Leadinfo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on government and education sectors.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and cloud infrastructure.
  5. ISO 27001 certification prominently displayed as a trust indicator.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact via form only.
  7. No terms of service found, which could be improved.
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern tech stack including React, Next.js, TypeScript, Node.js, Kubernetes, and Microsoft Azure, indicating a robust and scalable infrastructure. Hosting on Vercel and Azure ensures good performance and availability. The use of Strapi as a CMS allows flexible content management. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and structured content. Performance is fast, and the architecture supports composable and cloud-native principles. Technical debt appears minimal, and the site leverages best practices in frontend and backend development. Opportunities exist to further improve accessibility and formalize security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with worth.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review worth.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.