Skip to main content

Security report for wordpress.tv

Automattic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WordPress.tv is a community-curated video platform focused on WordPress-related content, including WordCamp talks, meetups, and tutorials. It operates under the umbrella of Automattic, the parent company of WordPress.com, leveraging the WordPress ecosystem to provide educational and community engagement services. The platform targets WordPress users, developers, and contributors worldwide, offering free access to a rich library of video content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress CMS with Jetpack and VideoPress integrations, hosted on WordPress.com infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site employs modern web technologies including asynchronous JavaScript loading, Typekit fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses nonce tokens in forms to prevent CSRF attacks. However, it lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and published security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, WordPress.tv presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound platform with moderate tracking and good content quality, suitable for its community-driven mission.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of wordpress.tv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wordpress.tv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
39
Security headers
45
Email security
42
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WordPress.tv occupies a niche position within the WordPress ecosystem as the primary video content hub for WordPress community events and educational materials. Its competitive advantage lies in its direct association with Automattic and WordPress.org, providing authoritative and curated content. The business model is primarily community and content-driven, supported by Automattic's infrastructure and brand. Revenue streams are indirect, likely through brand strengthening and ecosystem engagement rather than direct monetization. The target audience includes WordPress developers, contributors, and enthusiasts globally. Growth indicators include regular content updates and integration with WordPress community events. The partnership ecosystem includes WordPress.org, WordPress.com, and VideoPress, ensuring content delivery and platform stability. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain trust and comply with evolving regulations.

Security posture

The security posture of WordPress.tv is solid in terms of infrastructure, with HTTPS enforced and secure hosting on WordPress.com. The use of nonce tokens in forms and asynchronous script loading reduces common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a gap in transparency and readiness for security incidents. The lack of a cookie consent banner despite tracking scripts may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the site demonstrates good baseline security practices but should improve in policy publication and user privacy controls to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear and visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Create and publish a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Automattic
Description
WordPress.tv provides WordPress-related videos curated and moderated by the WordPress.org community, including WordCamp talks, meetups, keynotes, and tutorials.
Key services
Video hosting and streaming of WordPress events, Community content curation, Educational resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack plugin, VideoPress, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, Gravatar Hovercards, JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Jetpack
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of nonce and wpnonce tokens in forms
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (stats.wp.com), WordPress.com Pixel (pixel.wp.com)
Marketing tools
Jetpack Subscriptions
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a community-driven video platform for WordPress-related content.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear navigation and search functionality.
  3. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite tracking scripts.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact via subscription form only.
  5. Strong association with Automattic and WordPress.org community.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress ecosystem plugins.
  7. No visible security or privacy policy pages on the site itself, but links to WordPress.org privacy policy.
  8. No terms of service page found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, enhanced with Jetpack and VideoPress for video hosting and community features. The technical stack includes modern JavaScript modules, asynchronous loading of analytics and fonts, and integration with Google Tag Manager for marketing and tracking. Hosting on WordPress.com ensures robust infrastructure and uptime. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata in place. Some technical debt is evident in the lack of explicit cookie consent and security policy pages. Opportunities exist to modernize privacy compliance features and improve accessibility. The technical risks are low but include potential regulatory compliance issues related to privacy and cookie usage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wordpress.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wordpress.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.