Skip to main content

Security report for wolt.sk

Wolt · E-commerce · Slovakia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wolt is a well-established e-commerce platform specializing in fast delivery of food, groceries, and other local products, primarily targeting consumers in Slovakia and other countries. The website demonstrates a strong market position with a popular mobile app presence and extensive social media engagement. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and uses security best practices such as HTTPS and security headers. However, the absence of visible privacy, cookie, and security policies on the analyzed page indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid with no detected vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms, but public documentation of security and incident response policies is lacking. The website content is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit material detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wolt.sk

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
87
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wolt operates in the competitive food and goods delivery market, leveraging a mobile-first business model that connects consumers with local businesses for rapid delivery. The company benefits from high app ratings and a consistent brand presence across multiple platforms. Its business model focuses on convenience and speed, targeting urban consumers who value quick access to food and groceries. The lack of explicit contact information on the analyzed page suggests that customer support may be handled via app or other channels. The company uses a broad ecosystem of marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and growth. Strategic partnerships with app stores and social media platforms enhance its market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and bot protection via hCaptcha. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of publicly accessible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The integration of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies on the website to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations to minimize security risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wolt
Description
Keď ľudia vyskúšajú Wolt, zamilujú si ho! Radosť z jedla, potravín a ďalších vecí z lokálnych podnikov, doručená do 30 minút. Vyskúšajte obľúbenú modrú apku!
Key services
Food delivery, Grocery delivery, Local business product delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Intercom, AppsFlyer, Mapbox, Datadog RUM, hCaptcha
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Security headers implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of hCaptcha for bot protection
  • Secure external scripts loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Facebook Events
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AppsFlyer
Tracking pixels
Facebook Events, Datadog RUM
Marketing tools
Intercom, AppsFlyer, Datadog RUM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and localized for Slovakia.
  2. Strong presence on multiple social media platforms and app stores.
  3. Extensive use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the analyzed page.
  5. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  6. Security best practices are implemented but public security policies are missing.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, likely React, and integrates a variety of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Facebook Events, and AppsFlyer. It supports mobile platforms with dedicated Android and iOS applications, reflected in structured data. Performance is moderate with preconnect and preload optimizations for fonts and assets. The site uses multiple CDN and API endpoints to deliver content and services efficiently. While no CMS is explicitly detected, the infrastructure suggests a custom or headless architecture. Technical debt appears low, but accessibility could be improved. The site is well-optimized for SEO with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wolt.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wolt.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.