Skip to main content

Security report for wolf.sk

Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK · Other · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK is a Slovak non-profit organization dedicated to the protection of natural forests, carnivores, and natural processes through the creation of no-intervention reserves. The organization has a strong grassroots presence with over 25 years of activity, focusing on environmental advocacy, legal interventions, and public education. Their website serves as an information hub for campaigns, petitions, and educational content primarily in Slovak, targeting environmental activists and the general public interested in nature conservation. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with common libraries like jQuery and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the site is functional and content-rich, it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. Contact information is primarily available via a contact page rather than directly on the homepage. Overall, the website reflects a moderate level of digital maturity with room for improvements in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wolf.sk

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wolf.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wolf.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the environmental non-profit sector with a clear mission to protect forests and wildlife in Slovakia. Its business model relies on donations, memberships, and fundraising campaigns, supported by partnerships with related organizations such as ABIES publishing and donation platforms like darujme.sk. The website demonstrates a moderate market position with active campaigns and a loyal audience. The presence of social media links and external partnerships indicates a collaborative ecosystem. However, the lack of visible direct contact details and limited privacy mechanisms may impact user trust and engagement. The organization’s long history and focused mission provide competitive advantages in the Slovak environmental NGO space.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics scripts loaded securely, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. Forms lack visible CSRF tokens or advanced input validation, potentially exposing risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The site does not implement cookie consent banners, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Enhance form security by adding CSRF tokens and input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security transparency and trust.
  5. Increase visibility of contact information including official emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK
Description
Non-profit organization focused on protection of natural forests, carnivores, and natural processes by creating no-intervention reserves where nature alone decides and people can freely observe.
Key services
Forest conservation, Wildlife protection (wolves, bears, raptors), Environmental advocacy and legal interventions, Public education and awareness campaigns, Fundraising and membership programs
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Drupal CMS, Google Analytics, Lightbox2
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Slovak non-profit focused on forest and wildlife conservation
  2. Content is primarily in Slovak with English alternate available
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie banners found despite GDPR relevance
  4. Use of Drupal CMS with common modules and jQuery
  5. Active social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers directly on homepage; contact form likely on contact page
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations in HTML
  8. Google Analytics used for visitor tracking
  9. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure pages detected
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging jQuery and Lightbox2 for UI enhancements. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site loads multiple CSS modules and scripts asynchronously, which supports moderate performance. However, mobile optimization and accessibility features appear basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced responsive design detected. SEO is supported by meta tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including improved mobile responsiveness, accessibility compliance, and SEO enhancements. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wolf.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wolf.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.