Skip to main content

Security report for will-myers.com

Will Myers · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Will Myers operates a niche educational and software product website focused on Squarespace users, offering plugins, tutorials, and memberships to support website builders and coders. The business targets individuals and small business owners seeking to improve their Squarespace websites. Technically, the site is built on the Squarespace platform with additional custom JavaScript libraries and plugins, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party services such as Google Analytics and Typekit fonts. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking advanced security headers such as CSP and HSTS, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the WHOIS data is missing or the domain appears unregistered, which is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy in content and business model but requires verification of domain registration and enhancement of security headers to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching will-myers.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention will-myers.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
20
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for will-myers.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Will Myers holds a focused market position as a provider of Squarespace-related educational content and digital products. The business model relies on content sales, plugin sales, and memberships, targeting a specialized audience of Squarespace users and website builders. The presence of a money-back guarantee and active social media channels supports customer trust and engagement. The company operates primarily in the technology and education sectors within the US market. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The business appears small in size but well-branded and consistent in messaging. The use of affiliate programs and marketing tools indicates a mature approach to monetization and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and content injection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, which limits transparency in security management. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain ownership legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with preload and includeSubDomains directives.
  2. Implement a robust Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header to mitigate XSS and data injection risks.
  3. Add X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Will Myers
Description
Will Myers trains and supports website builders. This website provides video lessons in Squarespace, free Squarespace plugins, and general tech guidance for individuals and small business owners.
Key services
Squarespace plugins development, Website development, Coding tutorials and training, Membership with exclusive code snippets and mini-courses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Typekit Fonts, jQuery, Swiper.js, Flickity, Clipboard.js, Custom JavaScript plugins
Frameworks
Squarespace platform
Platforms
Squarespace hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Peachs Affiliate Program
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with custom plugins and scripts
  2. Content is focused on Squarespace tutorials, plugins, and coding education
  3. Active social media presence on YouTube, Instagram, and Bluesky
  4. Cookie consent banner and privacy policy present indicating privacy awareness
  5. No advanced security headers detected, room for security improvements
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is unusual for an active site
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, enhanced with multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Swiper.js, Flickity, Clipboard.js, and custom plugins hosted on vercel.app and cdn.jsdelivr.net. The site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses modern fonts via Typekit and loads resources asynchronously to optimize load times. Hosting is provided by Squarespace, ensuring stable infrastructure but limiting server-level security controls. Technical debt appears low with a clean and structured layout, but security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with will-myers.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review will-myers.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.