Skip to main content

Security report for wholovesburrito.com

Who Loves Burrito · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Who Loves Burrito is a specialized online platform serving as a neutral clearinghouse for information on Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN). The website offers resources including project listings, hardware discounts, mobile app information, and community event listings, targeting DePIN enthusiasts, miners, investors, and builders within the Web3 ecosystem. The business operates primarily as an information hub with affiliate marketing elements and token promotion. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and employs modern plugins for SEO and analytics, hosted on a Pressable infrastructure with Cloudflare DNS. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and domain registration includes standard EPP locks, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR explicit indicators. Overall, the site is legitimate, well-structured, and serves a niche technology audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wholovesburrito.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche position in the emerging DePIN and Web3 market, providing curated content and community resources. Its business model leverages content marketing, affiliate hardware sales, and token promotion to generate revenue. The target audience is specialized, including miners, investors, and builders interested in decentralized infrastructure. The site demonstrates growth potential through community engagement and partnerships, as evidenced by social media presence and event listings. However, the lack of physical contact information and limited privacy compliance may impact trust for some users. The company is relatively new, founded in 2023, and operates as a small-sized entity focused on technology sector content.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR explicit indicators. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational website but could be improved to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Who Loves Burrito
Description
Who Loves Burrito is a neutral clearinghouse providing free information about Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN). It offers guides, hardware discounts, project listings, and community resources related to DePIN and Web3 participation.
Key services
DePIN project clearinghouse, Hardware discounts and coupons, DePIN mobile apps listings, Community event listings, Token information and promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), Cloudflare DNS, Stackable Gutenberg Blocks, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via MonsterInsights), Gaug.es
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Gaug.es
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche information hub for DePIN and Web3 enthusiasts.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multiple resource pages.
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; contact primarily via email and forms.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses popular plugins such as MonsterInsights for analytics and Stackable for Gutenberg block enhancements. Hosting appears to be on Pressable with Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO benefits. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Accessibility is basic but functional. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but should be enhanced for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wholovesburrito.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wholovesburrito.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.