Skip to main content

Security report for whoisvisiting.com

Whoisvisiting.com · Technology · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

60/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Whoisvisiting.com is a technology company specializing in website visitor tracking software and B2B lead generation solutions. Their platform offers products such as Visiting for real-time visitor identification, Prospecting for company database searches, Personalize for customized website experiences, and White Label solutions for agencies. The company targets B2B businesses aiming to enhance marketing ROI and sales funnel efficiency. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Salient theme and WPBakery page builder, leveraging modern tracking and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and OneSignal. The site employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration, though lacks some advanced security headers. Privacy and terms of service pages are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected. Security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises some concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Despite this, the business information, contact details, and social media presence support a trustworthy profile. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and security, with minor improvements recommended in privacy consent and WHOIS transparency. Strategically, Whoisvisiting.com should focus on enhancing domain registration transparency, implementing explicit cookie consent, and publishing security policies to strengthen trust and compliance. These steps will improve their security posture and business credibility in a competitive SaaS market.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of whoisvisiting.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whoisvisiting.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Whoisvisiting.com operates in the technology sector providing SaaS solutions for website visitor tracking and lead generation. Their competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive product suite addressing visitor identification, prospecting, personalization, and white label offerings. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and agency partnerships. The target customers are B2B companies seeking to optimize marketing and sales through data-driven insights. The company has a global user base of 6,000 users across 2,000+ businesses, indicating solid market penetration. Partnerships with platforms like Crisp Chat and integrations with hundreds of apps enhance their ecosystem. The website content and social media presence reflect active marketing and customer engagement strategies. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not currently undermine operational credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but no vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. The absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No published security policy or incident response information was found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy policy and GDPR page presence. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations to mitigate risks from third-party scripts and tracking technologies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish detailed security policy and incident response procedures on the website.
  2. Implement explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Clarify domain WHOIS registration details or use verified domain registration to improve trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Whoisvisiting.com
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Whoisvisiting.com
Description
Whoisvisiting shows you the companies visiting your website so you can identify new leads and increase your marketing ROI. 14-Day Free Trial.
Key services
Website visitor tracking (Visiting), Prospecting database, Personalized website experiences, White label solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Bing Ads, Hotjar, OneSignal, Crisp Chat, Sumo, Quora Pixel, jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, Salient Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and tracking scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Capterra Tracker
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Quora Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Sumo, Capterra Tracker, Fomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, reducing domain trust
  4. Comprehensive privacy and terms pages present
  5. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts in use
  6. Contact information including emails, phones, and addresses clearly provided
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress)
  8. Good SEO and social media integration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Salient theme and WPBakery page builder, indicating a widely supported and extensible infrastructure. It integrates numerous third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, OneSignal, and Crisp Chat, reflecting a sophisticated data collection and user engagement strategy. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely impacted by multiple external scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found. Overall, the technical stack is modern and well implemented but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whoisvisiting.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whoisvisiting.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.