Skip to main content

Security report for whataventure.com

Whataventure · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Whataventure is a medium-sized consulting and venture building firm specializing in leveraging corporate assets and entrepreneurial agility to create new business ventures. The company serves corporate leaders and innovation teams across multiple sectors including construction, consumer goods, energy, industrial goods, and mobility. Their market position is strong, supported by significant investments in projects and numerous ventures built in partnership with clients. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-branded, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Cloudflare hosting, Weglot for translation, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, a critical security weakness is the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, which severely impacts the security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Contact information is comprehensive with multiple direct emails and contact forms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but requires urgent remediation of SSL and TLS issues to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whataventure.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Whataventure operates in the corporate innovation and venture building space, targeting medium to large enterprises seeking to develop new business models and ventures. Their services span discovery, launch, and growth phases of new business creation, including intrapreneurship programs and corporate venturing. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem with notable clients and certifications, enhancing credibility. Their business model relies on consulting and hands-on venture creation, supported by a digital presence that showcases client references and case studies. The firm leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage prospects and nurture leads. Growth indicators include a broad industry focus and a portfolio of over 40 ventures with significant investment volumes. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation leadership and practical entrepreneurial support within corporate environments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security best practices such as setting security headers including HSTS, CSP frame-ancestors, and X-Frame-Options. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and no TLS protocols are enabled, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No OCSP stapling or session resumption mechanisms are in place, and certificate transparency compliance is absent. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. Forms are present and appear to have business email validation to prevent use of free email domains, which is a positive security control. Overall, the security posture is weak due to fundamental SSL/TLS misconfiguration, requiring immediate attention to protect user data and maintain compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure communications.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and configure strong cipher suites to protect data in transit.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  6. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve compliance and user experience.
  7. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.
  8. Continue leveraging trust indicators such as certifications and client references to build credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, ensuring good global availability and performance potential. It uses modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Typekit fonts, and Weglot for multilingual support. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. However, performance metrics such as load time and page size were not available, indicating a need for further performance monitoring. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and TLS support is a significant technical risk. The site uses custom scripts for UI enhancements and form validation, including business email domain checks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires SSL/TLS remediation and ongoing performance and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whataventure.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whataventure.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.