Westwerk Events is a small, specialized event organization company focused on designing and delivering UX and product design conferences, workshops, and training courses primarily in Denmark and Europe. Their key services include organizing flagship events such as Future Product Days, UX Nordic, and prompt:UX, as well as providing custom UX courses and event experience design training to corporate clients. The company targets UX professionals, event creators, and sponsors interested in tech-driven, innovative event experiences. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Lottie animations, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile and performance, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and formal policies are missing. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection and malformed WHOIS response, but domain expiry is valid and recent, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a niche event business.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention westwerk.events, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for westwerk.events right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Westwerk Events occupies a niche market segment focusing on UX and product design events and training, differentiating itself through high-quality, interactive experiences and tailored workshops. Their business model combines event ticket sales, corporate training, and sponsorship partnerships. The company demonstrates a clear understanding of its target audience and maintains a consistent brand image. The partnership with Future Product Days enhances their market reach and credibility. While the company appears small, it leverages digital platforms effectively to engage its audience and grow its event portfolio. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information is typical for small event organizers but could be improved for enhanced business credibility.
Security posture
The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics is standard but should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened by implementing additional headers, formal policies, and security best practices.
Recommendations
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
Publish a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and facilitate responsible reporting.
Develop and publish an incident response policy or contact channel to demonstrate preparedness for security incidents.
Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations, improving legal compliance and trust.
Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Westwerk Events
Description
Westwerk Events designs experiences, events, workshops, and courses offering innovative and interactive concepts with high quality content and new knowledge perspectives. They organize conferences such as Future Product Days, UX Nordic, and prompt:UX, and provide custom UX courses and event experience design training.
Webflow, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Lottie animations
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent mechanism implemented
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response and privacy protection.
Website uses Webflow CMS and hosting with modern technologies.
Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
Contact information is provided via email and contact page.
No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
No social media links detected in the HTML content.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Website content is professional and targeted at UX and event professionals.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies such as jQuery and Lottie animations for enhanced user experience. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring good performance and uptime. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies, indicating a well-maintained technical infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and add formal policies to align with best practices.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with westwerk.events. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review westwerk.events.