Skip to main content

Security report for wellit.sk

Wellit s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wellit s.r.o. is a Slovakian technology company specializing in web development, e-commerce solutions, custom web applications, cloud repositories, and hosting services. Established in 2010 and operating under the Wellit brand since 2012, the company targets businesses seeking modern, user-friendly digital solutions. Their market position is that of a small but established technology service provider emphasizing innovation and partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 4.7.29 using Cherry Framework and Bootstrap, incorporating common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and FlexSlider. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which impacts GDPR compliance. The WordPress version is outdated, posing potential security risks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the visible content. Overall, the website is professional and business-focused with good content quality and navigation. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wellit.sk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wellit s.r.o. operates in the technology sector, providing a suite of digital services including website and e-commerce development, custom internal applications, cloud document repositories, and hosting. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting small to medium enterprises and organizations needing tailored digital solutions. The company leverages partnerships and focuses on innovation to maintain competitiveness. Their market presence is regional (Slovakia) with a consistent brand identity. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based development, hosting subscriptions, and cloud services. The company maintains a modest social media presence and a clear product portfolio, indicating a stable but niche market position.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The outdated WordPress version increases vulnerability risk. No published security or incident response policies limit the company's transparency and readiness to handle security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policy details. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but updating platform components and implementing security best practices are critical to improving security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Upgrade WordPress and all plugins/themes to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR requirements.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data protection practices and appointing a Data Protection Officer if applicable.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Wellit s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wellit s.r.o.
Description
Wellit s.r.o. is a technology company focused on developing websites, e-commerce solutions, custom web applications, cloud repositories, and hosting services. They emphasize innovation, modern technology, and user-friendly solutions. Operating since 2010 and branded as Wellit since 2012, they serve clients seeking web and application development, cloud storage, and hosting.
Key services
Websites and E-Shops, Custom Web Applications and Internal Information Systems, Cloud Repositories for Documents, Web Hosting and Virtual Servers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FlexSlider, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome, Camera Slider, Cherry Framework, WordPress 4.7.29
Frameworks
Cherry Framework, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is business-focused and professional
  3. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found except terms of service page
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage or footer
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook and Google+
  6. Uses outdated WordPress version (4.7.29) which may pose security risks
  7. No visible security headers detected
  8. No cookie consent mechanism present
  9. No security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.7.29 with Cherry Framework and Bootstrap for responsive design. It uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, FlexSlider, and Owl Carousel for UI components. The site loads external resources from Google APIs and CDN providers. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Technical debt is indicated by the outdated WordPress version and absence of recent CMS updates, which could impact security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wellit.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wellit.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.