Skip to main content

Security report for websecurityscan.eu

Web Security Scan · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Web Security Scan is a specialized cybersecurity service provider focusing on penetration testing and security assessments for applications and IT infrastructures. With over 15 years of ethical hacking experience, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services including pentesting, vulnerability scanning, code reviews, red teaming, and security workshops. Positioned as a trusted partner for businesses seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture, Web Security Scan emphasizes compliance with major frameworks such as OWASP, PCI-DSS, ISO27001, and NIS2. The company operates as a division of DongIT, leveraging combined expertise in web security and development.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching websecurityscan.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention websecurityscan.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for websecurityscan.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses requiring robust security assessments and compliance support, including multinationals, SMBs, government agencies, and non-profits. Its business model is service-oriented, providing tailored pentesting solutions and expert guidance throughout the security testing lifecycle. The presence of client logos and certifications indicates a strong market position and trustworthiness. The parent company DongIT suggests a broader ecosystem supporting Web Security Scan's operations. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly with cookie consent mechanisms in place.

Security posture

Web Security Scan demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, certified pentesters, and adherence to recognized security frameworks. The website implements a cookie consent mechanism and uses modern analytics tools with privacy considerations. However, explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing incident response contacts and security.txt files.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Add a dedicated incident response or abuse contact page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Consider adding visible company contact emails for easier communication.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Web Security Scan
Description
Provides penetration testing and security assessments for applications and IT infrastructures with over 15 years of ethical hacking experience.
Key services
Pentesting, Vulnerability Scan, Network & Cloud Infrastructure Security, Red Teaming, Phishing Test, Code Review | Static Code Analysis, Support with Secure Development, Security Workshops & Master Classes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of certified pentesters
  • Compliance with OWASP, PCI-DSS, ISO27001, NIS2

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on pentesting and security assessments with certifications.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed options.
  4. No visible contact emails on the homepage; phone number provided in structured data.
  5. No terms of service or incident response contact found.
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy considerations.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS and uses modern technologies including Google Tag Manager and Cookie Script for analytics and consent management. Hosting is managed through a reputable registrar, Key-Systems GmbH. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence, though adding security headers and improving incident response visibility would strengthen the technical security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with websecurityscan.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review websecurityscan.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.