Skip to main content

Security report for pakapieni-attistibas-centrs1.webnode.lv

Webnode AG · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webnode AG operates a well-established online platform providing easy-to-use website building tools, domain registration, and e-commerce solutions. The company targets individuals and small to medium businesses seeking fast and simple website creation, boasting over 50 million users globally. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and offers localized content in Latvian with strong branding consistency. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, Google analytics and tag management, reCAPTCHA for security, and a CDN for performance, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, likely due to privacy or registry restrictions, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy. The site maintains good privacy compliance and transparency with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie management. Overall, Webnode presents a credible, secure, and user-friendly service platform with room for improvement in explicit security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pakapieni-attistibas-centrs1.webnode.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pakapieni-attistibas-centrs1.webnode.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
360
Employees
0
Customers
360
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pakapieni-attistibas-centrs1.webnode.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webnode AG holds a significant market position in the website builder SaaS sector, leveraging a freemium business model with premium upgrades for additional features. Their competitive advantage lies in ease of use, multilingual support, and integrated domain and email services. Revenue streams include premium subscriptions, domain sales, and e-commerce plans. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem including affiliate programs and social media engagement. Growth indicators include a large user base and 15 years of operational experience. The company’s operations are supported by a robust technical platform and localized customer support, enhancing customer retention and satisfaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 to mitigate automated abuse, and nonce attributes on scripts to prevent injection attacks. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, indicating compliance awareness. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security score is strong but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and providing direct security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct security contact emails such as security@ or abuse@ addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user privacy controls.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webnode AG
Description
Viegla mājas lapas izstrāde ar Webnode tiešsaistes redaktoru. Domēna vārds un uzturēšāna ir iekļāuti. Ātrs klientu atbalsts? par Tevi parūpēsies.
Key services
Website builder, Domain registration and hosting, E-commerce solutions, Email services, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA v2 and v3, Cloudfront CDN, AccessiWay accessibility tool
Frameworks
Angular (ng-2018 class suggests Angular usage)
Platforms
Webnode proprietary CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3
  • Nonce attributes on scripts
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Accessibility compliance tool (AccessiWay)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Seznam.cz
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Seznam.cz tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Professional design and consistent branding.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers visible on main page; contact via support page.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to registry or privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Angular framework, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA services, served via Amazon Cloudfront CDN for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features via the AccessiWay tool. Performance is fast with efficient resource loading and caching. The use of nonce attributes on scripts indicates attention to content security policies. Technical debt appears minimal, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pakapieni-attistibas-centrs1.webnode.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pakapieni-attistibas-centrs1.webnode.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.