Skip to main content

Security report for weblex.eu

E-commerce · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website https://weblex.eu/ is currently in maintenance mode, displaying a placeholder page with minimal content and no active business information. The site appears to be an e-commerce platform built on OpenCart with the Journal3 theme, but no products or services are currently accessible. The lack of privacy, cookie, terms of service, and contact information indicates the site is either under development or temporarily offline. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as Bootstrap and Font Awesome, with Google Fonts for typography. However, no advanced security headers or policies are implemented, and no analytics or marketing tools are detected. The WHOIS data shows the domain is registered via a reputable registrar, Ascio Technologies Inc., but lacks detailed registrant information, which is common for many domains. Overall, the site has a low trust and security posture due to the absence of critical policies and content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weblex.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the maintenance status, there is limited business intelligence available. The site targets e-commerce customers but currently does not provide any product or service information. The business model is likely retail or online sales, but no market positioning or competitive advantages can be assessed. No partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators are present. The lack of contact details and policies reduces credibility and customer trust. Growth indicators and strategic observations cannot be determined at this stage.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, with no visible security headers, no incident response or security policies, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site uses HTTPS (implied by base href https://), but SSL configuration details are unknown. No forms or inputs are present to evaluate secure handling of user data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No security best practices are observed, and the site is vulnerable to trust issues from a security perspective.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish terms of service and security policies including incident response contacts to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer communication.
  4. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enable vulnerability disclosure policies and consider adding a security.txt file to improve security posture and community trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be an e-commerce store currently in maintenance mode with no active content available.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Journal3 Theme, OpenCart
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
OpenCart
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently in maintenance mode with no active content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms detected.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No certifications or trust badges visible.
  6. Uses OpenCart CMS with Journal3 theme and standard web fonts.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No external business-related domains linked.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. No social media or contact emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on OpenCart CMS with the Journal3 theme, utilizing Bootstrap and Font Awesome for UI components and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, the site is currently in maintenance mode, limiting content availability and user interaction. Performance appears moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to lack of active content. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and Open Graph metadata present but no structured data or rich snippets detected. Accessibility features are minimal. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, indicating limited data collection or user behavior analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weblex.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weblex.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.