Skip to main content

Security report for webhouse.family

E-GO, s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebHouse, operated by E-GO, s.r.o., is a reputable Slovakian hosting and domain registration provider managing over 56,000 domains. The company offers a range of hosting plans, including shared hosting, virtual and dedicated servers, and business email services, targeting both individual and business customers. Their market position is solid within the regional technology sector, emphasizing reliability and customer care with a 100% uptime guarantee. Technically, the website employs a mature technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility features, though some accessibility aspects could be improved. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on Google and Facebook services for analytics and social media integration. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed comprehensively via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options are not clearly detected and could be enhanced. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, WebHouse presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong privacy compliance and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a formal security policy, and maintaining up-to-date third-party libraries to further strengthen security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webhouse.family

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebHouse operates as an essential technology sector business focused on domain registration and web hosting services. Their business model is service-oriented, providing scalable hosting solutions and server infrastructure to a diverse customer base. The company leverages partnerships with setup.sk and maintains a dedicated support portal, indicating a well-established ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include recurring hosting fees and domain registrations. The company demonstrates growth through managing a large domain portfolio and offers multiple hosting tiers to address different market segments. Their social media presence and transparent privacy practices enhance brand trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse, and comprehensive cookie consent management via Cookiebot. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Data protection practices align with GDPR requirements, supported by a clear privacy policy and cookie management. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not explicitly documented, representing an area for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and monitor cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
E-GO, s.r.o.
Description
Domain registration and web hosting, this is WebHouse - the Home of Happy Domains. Hosting with 100% guaranteed uptime. We manage more than 56,000 domains.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting (multiple plans), Virtual and dedicated servers, Business email services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.2.0, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Google Ads conversion tracking, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive hosting and domain registration services.
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place.
  3. Use of reputable third-party services for analytics and advertising.
  4. Clear contact information with phone and newsletter subscription form.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used technology stack featuring Bootstrap 3.2.0 and jQuery, supplemented by Google services for analytics and reCAPTCHA, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts which may impact load times. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Technical risks include potential outdated libraries and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webhouse.family. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webhouse.family.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.