Skip to main content

Security report for webflowmarketingmain.com

Webflow · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webflow is a leading no-code website builder platform founded in 2013, offering a comprehensive suite of services including visual website design, CMS, hosting, SEO optimization, and AI-powered enhancements. The company targets marketers, designers, developers, and agencies, positioning itself as a mature and enterprise-grade SaaS provider in the technology sector. The website demonstrates excellent design quality, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency, supported by extensive marketing and analytics integrations. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and standard domain status, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. The domain WHOIS data shows an anomalous future creation date, which should be verified for accuracy. Overall, Webflow's digital presence reflects a professional and trustworthy business with room for improvement in transparency around privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webflowmarketingmain.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Webflow operates in the competitive no-code website builder market, offering a platform that empowers users to design, build, and launch custom websites without coding. Its business model is SaaS-based, generating revenue through subscriptions and enterprise solutions. The company has a strong market position supported by a broad target audience including marketers, designers, developers, and agencies. Webflow's ecosystem includes integrations, apps, and a partner network, enhancing its competitive advantage. The presence of customer success stories and a focus on AI-driven features indicate growth orientation and innovation. The company is headquartered in the US with a significant enterprise customer base, reflecting maturity and scale.

Security posture

Webflow maintains a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status compliant with ICANN standards. The use of AWS DNS servers and Amazon Registrar indicates reliance on reputable infrastructure providers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in transparency and potential risk areas. The website includes multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts, which may increase the attack surface if not properly managed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, Webflow demonstrates good security hygiene but should enhance its public security documentation and consider DNSSEC implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks and enhance privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Webflow
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Webflow
Description
Build responsive websites with Webflow, a no-code website builder. Design, build, and launch completely custom websites without writing code.
Key services
Visual website design, CMS, Hosting, SEO optimization, AI-powered site enhancements, Localization, Integrations and Apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, JavaScript, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Google Tag Manager, Marketo Munchkin, Dreamdata Analytics, Quora Pixel, Facebook Pixel, GrowSumo, Reddit Pixel, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, 6sense, Sprig
Frameworks
Webflow, GSAP
Platforms
Webflow Hosting, AWS (Amazon Registrar, AWS DNS servers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Domain status OK
  • Use of security related external scripts (Marketo, Facebook Pixel, etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Dreamdata Analytics, Marketo Munchkin, Google Analytics (via GTM), Sprig
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads, Quora Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, Dreamdata Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Bing Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Marketo, Dreamdata, Sprig, Intellimize
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and built using Webflow platform.
  2. Extensive use of marketing and analytics scripts indicating mature marketing operations.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact information or forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Strong branding consistency and clear business focus on no-code website building.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Domain WHOIS data contains an anomalous creation date in the future.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and animation frameworks such as GSAP. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Marketo, Dreamdata, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting is provided via AWS, ensuring scalability and reliability. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data. The anomalous WHOIS creation date suggests a data inconsistency that should be clarified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and professional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webflowmarketingmain.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webflowmarketingmain.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.