Webflow Cookies · Technology · N/a
Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
Webflow Cookies offers a specialized GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner solution tailored for Webflow websites. The company positions itself as a leading provider in this niche, boasting over 10,000 installations and emphasizing expert installation, customization, and integration with Google Tag Manager and Consent Mode v2. Their business model is based on a one-time payment for a fully managed service, including branding alignment and technical setup. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, providing clear navigation and trust signals such as testimonials and a money-back guarantee. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, JavaScript libraries, and third-party services like Hotjar and Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager. The hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring good performance and security through HTTPS. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no published security or incident response policies are found, which could be improved to enhance security posture. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices with secure forms and cookie consent mechanisms, but the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. The lack of direct company contact emails or phone numbers also limits business credibility. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but has room for improvement in business credibility and security transparency. Strategically, the company should focus on publishing clear security policies, improving domain registration transparency, and providing direct contact information to strengthen trust. Regular audits of third-party scripts and implementation of security headers would further enhance the security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention webflow-cookies.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for webflow-cookies.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with webflow-cookies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webflow-cookies.com.