Skip to main content

Security report for webdriver.io

Linux Foundation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WebdriverIO is an advanced open source browser and mobile automation testing framework primarily targeting Node.js developers and QA engineers. Owned and governed by the Linux Foundation and part of the OpenJS Foundation, it enjoys strong community support and corporate sponsorship from companies like BrowserStack, Jetify, and LambdaTest. The website offers comprehensive documentation, multilingual support, and integration with popular developer tools such as Chrome DevTools and Google Lighthouse, positioning WebdriverIO as a versatile and feature-rich testing solution in the automation market. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks including Docusaurus and leverages technologies like Node.js, JavaScript, and Appium. It is hosted on AWS infrastructure, optimized for fast performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. The site employs Google Analytics for user tracking and Algolia DocSearch for search functionality, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, it lacks DNSSEC and some recommended security headers, and does not provide explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and GDPR compliance, but no cookie consent mechanism was found. Overall, WebdriverIO's website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity with minor areas for improvement in security and privacy compliance. The domain registration data aligns well with the organizational claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing security and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webdriver.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention webdriver.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for webdriver.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WebdriverIO holds a strong position in the software testing automation market as a next-generation open source framework with broad browser and mobile device support. Its business model is community-driven and funded by corporate sponsorships, reflecting a sustainable open governance approach under the Linux Foundation umbrella. The project targets developers and QA professionals seeking reliable, standards-based automation tools. Its ecosystem includes integrations with popular frameworks and developer tools, enhancing its competitive advantage. The presence of high-profile users like Google, Netflix, Microsoft, and Mozilla indicates strong market adoption and credibility. Growth is supported by active community engagement, multilingual documentation, and strategic partnerships with testing infrastructure providers. The project’s transparent governance and sponsorship model foster trust and ongoing innovation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer restrictions. The absence of DNSSEC is a notable gap that could expose DNS spoofing risks. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the site content. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partially addressed but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is important for GDPR adherence. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and formalized security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve web security posture.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linux Foundation
Description
Next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js
Key services
Browser automation testing, Mobile automation testing, Component testing, Integration with developer tools (Chrome DevTools, Lighthouse), Support for multiple frameworks and platforms
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Node.js, JavaScript, Docusaurus, Google Analytics, Mermaid.js, Testing Library, Appium
Frameworks
Docusaurus v3.6.3, WebDriver protocol, WebDriver Bidi, Appium
Platforms
Browser, Mobile, Smart TVs, IoT devices
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Algolia DocSearch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional open source project site for WebdriverIO automation framework
  2. Strong community and corporate sponsorship presence
  3. Comprehensive documentation and multilingual support
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR compliance claims
  6. Good technical implementation with modern frameworks and fast performance
  7. Security posture is good but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and trustworthiness
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and robust technical stack featuring Node.js, JavaScript, and the Docusaurus static site generator. It integrates advanced testing libraries and tools such as Appium and Testing Library for component testing. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS servers, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site demonstrates fast loading times, mobile optimization, and accessibility best practices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of Google Analytics and Algolia DocSearch indicates mature user engagement and search capabilities. There is minimal technical debt visible, and the site is well maintained with frequent updates and active community contributions. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance to further modernize the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webdriver.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webdriver.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.