Skip to main content

Security report for web4ukraine.org

Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website web4ukraine.org is an activist campaign platform aimed at stopping Russian military aggression against Ukraine. It provides a JavaScript tool designed to delay Russian user visits and is actively used on thousands of websites. The site targets webmasters and supporters of the cause, operating as a small non-profit or activist entity primarily based in the Czech Republic. The domain was registered in 2022, consistent with the campaign's recent origin. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics for tracking. It is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN and DNS services, ensuring good performance and security at the infrastructure level. The site is mobile optimized and has basic SEO and accessibility features. However, it lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and Cloudflare protection but misses important security best practices such as security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. No forms collect user data except a readonly textarea with a JavaScript snippet. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. The WHOIS data aligns with the website's origin and purpose, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and serves its activist purpose but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening to enhance trust and protection. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of web4ukraine.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching web4ukraine.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

web4ukraine.org operates as a niche activist platform focused on anti-Russian military aggression messaging and technical tools. Its competitive advantage lies in providing a widely adopted JavaScript snippet that limits Russian visits on over 9,000 websites, with over 85 million visits affected. The business model is non-commercial, relying on awareness and voluntary adoption by webmasters. The target audience includes website owners sympathetic to Ukraine's cause. The partnership with wpii.dev for WordPress monitoring indicates a supportive ecosystem. Growth indicators include active usage statistics and multi-language presence via web4ukrajina.cz. The site maintains a lean operational footprint with no evident commercial revenue streams or certifications.

Security posture

The security posture of web4ukraine.org is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and Cloudflare CDN provides baseline protection and performance benefits. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency and readiness. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface. Google Analytics and Cloudflare Insights are used for tracking, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but should adopt additional security best practices to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden against common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness in case of security incidents.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is dedicated to stopping Russian military aggression against Ukraine by providing a JavaScript tool to delay Russian users' visits. It supports a non-profit or activist cause.
Key services
JavaScript tool to delay Russian users, Awareness campaign
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, Google Fonts (Jost), Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare DNS and CDN, Cloudflare Insights beacon
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an activist campaign site focused on anti-Russian military aggression.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to an email in meta author tag.
  4. No forms collecting user data except a readonly textarea with JavaScript snippet.
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies and Cloudflare CDN.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No evidence of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
  8. WHOIS data consistent with website claims and origin.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Limited business information and no certifications.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and lightweight technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and Google Analytics for user tracking. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as jsdelivr and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking scripts. Accessibility and SEO are basic but functional. There is no detected CMS or backend technology from the HTML content. The site could benefit from enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers to reduce technical risks. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a small activist site but has room for modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with web4ukraine.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review web4ukraine.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.