Skip to main content

Security report for nist.gov

National Institute of Standards and Technology · Government · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

94/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a U.S. government agency under the Department of Commerce, established in 1901. It plays a critical role in advancing measurement science, standards, and technology to enhance economic security and improve quality of life. The website reflects its authoritative position with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and a professional design targeting industry, scientific communities, and the public. The business model is government-funded research and standards provision, positioning NIST as a leading national metrology institute. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies and performance optimizations including Cloudflare CDN and New Relic monitoring. It demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities. Privacy policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, though cookie consent mechanisms could be enhanced. Overall, NIST's website is highly trustworthy, secure, and professionally maintained, reflecting its government status and mission. It effectively balances transparency, user experience, and security, making it a reliable resource for its diverse audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
95/ 100 · Low
GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Tracking cookies set without a consent banner

      Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. The site set 4 analytics or marketing cookies: Google Analytics (_ga_CSLL4ZEK4L, _ga, _ga_HEQ0YF2VYL). No consent banner or consent platform was detected (Guard scans from the EU, so EU-only banners would have been shown).

      What to do: Load analytics and marketing tags only after the visitor opts in, using a consent banner that offers accept and reject with equal prominence.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nist.gov

This scan found 8 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
97
DNS health
98
Network security
100
Website hygiene
95
GDPR outside view
75
Average
94

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nist.gov, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
817
Employees
11
Customers
719
Third parties
87
Weak passwords
12%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nist.gov.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NIST holds a dominant position as the U.S. national metrology institute, providing essential services such as calibration, standards development, and research across multiple sectors including technology, manufacturing, and cybersecurity. Its partnerships with government and industry entities, along with extensive resources and data services, underpin its strategic importance. The website's integration with commerce.gov and other government domains reinforces its official status. The agency's growth is steady, supported by federal funding and a broad mandate to support innovation and economic competitiveness.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Use of Drupal CMS ensures regular security updates and built-in protections such as CSRF tokens on forms. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, indicating preparedness. However, the absence of a security.txt file and explicit cookie consent banner are minor gaps. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add explicit Data Protection Officer contact information to improve GDPR compliance transparency.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for privacy and security impact.
  5. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts and procedures on the website for better stakeholder awareness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Description
NIST promotes U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life.
Key services
Measurement science, Standards development, Technology research, Calibration services, Laboratory accreditation, Data and software resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10 CMS, Google Tag Manager, New Relic monitoring, Cloudflare Insights, JavaScript ES6 modules
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Secure forms with CSRF protection (Drupal default)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official U.S. government website with .gov domain
  2. Comprehensive and well-structured content focused on standards and technology
  3. Strong branding and consistent design
  4. Multiple social media channels linked with verified presence
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  7. No cookie consent banner detected, which could be improved
  8. Privacy and vulnerability disclosure policies are present and comprehensive
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS, a modern and secure platform, combined with Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. Hosting appears to be government-managed with Cloudflare CDN for security and speed. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is fast with no broken elements detected. The technical stack is well-maintained with minimal technical debt, supporting a robust and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nist.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nist.gov.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.