Skip to main content

Security report for web4ukraine.org

Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website web4ukraine.org is a small-scale advocacy platform focused on opposing Russian military aggression against Ukraine. It provides a JavaScript tool that is actively used on over 9,000 websites to delay Russian user visits, demonstrating a niche but impactful service. The site is hosted via Cloudflare and uses modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Fonts, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. The content is clear, relevant, and professionally presented, targeting website owners and administrators who wish to participate in the campaign. From a technical perspective, the website employs a modern tech stack with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. However, it lacks some security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers, which could be improved. The site uses HTTPS properly, ensuring encrypted communication. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no consent mechanisms are present. Security posture is moderate; no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the lack of security headers and DNSSEC reduces the overall security score. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's origin and purpose, with no suspicious patterns. Overall, the website is trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures. Strategic recommendations include implementing DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and establishing incident response contacts to improve compliance and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching web4ukraine.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

web4ukraine.org operates as a non-profit advocacy platform with a clear mission to counter Russian military aggression against Ukraine. Its business model revolves around providing a free JavaScript tool to webmasters, enabling them to limit Russian visits to their sites. The target audience includes website owners sympathetic to the cause. The site has established partnerships with related domains such as web4ukrajina.cz and wpii.dev, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The platform's market position is niche but impactful, with over 9,000 active deployments. Revenue streams are not evident, suggesting reliance on donations or volunteer support. The organization appears small and focused, founded in 2022, with consistent branding and a clear message.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Cloudflare CDN is used for hosting and DNS, providing baseline protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are notable gaps. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance deficiencies with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. The use of Google Analytics and Cloudflare Insights introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies along with a user consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response contacts such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is dedicated to stopping Russian military aggression against Ukraine by providing a JavaScript tool to delay Russian users' visits on websites.
Key services
JavaScript script to delay Russian users, Awareness campaign against Russian military aggression
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, Google Fonts (Jost), Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare DNS and CDN, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a focused advocacy platform against Russian military aggression in Ukraine.
  2. Provides a JavaScript tool used by thousands of websites to limit Russian visits.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses provided; only an email in meta author tag.
  5. Uses modern front-end technologies and Cloudflare for hosting and DNS.
  6. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Google Analytics and Cloudflare Insights used for tracking.
  8. No forms present on the page; no user data collection beyond analytics.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 5.1.3 and Google Fonts, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. Google Analytics and Cloudflare Insights are used for visitor tracking. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears to be a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with web4ukraine.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review web4ukraine.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.