Skip to main content

Security report for weareantenna.be

Antenna · Technology · Belgium

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Antenna is a Belgium-based digital solutions provider specializing in custom software development, digital platforms, UX design, and e-commerce solutions tailored to business needs. Founded in 2018, the company positions itself as a trusted partner for businesses seeking bespoke digital transformation services. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear case studies, partner logos, and client testimonials, indicating a solid market position in the technology sector. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, and Leadinfo. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, demonstrating some privacy compliance efforts. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and employs standard tracking and consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response contact information, which are important for comprehensive compliance and trust. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the WHOIS data or website content. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weareantenna.be

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Antenna operates in the technology sector focusing on custom digital solutions for businesses. Their business model revolves around service provision including software development, UX design, and digital platform creation. The company targets medium-sized enterprises and organizations seeking tailored digital transformation. Their market positioning is supported by partnerships with notable clients and visible case studies. Revenue streams likely include project-based software development and ongoing digital services. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses multiple analytics tools to monitor and optimize user engagement. Growth indicators include a consistent web presence since 2018 and diversified service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of consent management tools. Tracking scripts and analytics are implemented responsibly with user consent mechanisms. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate, supporting domain trustworthiness. To enhance security posture, the company should publish comprehensive privacy and security policies, implement security headers, and provide clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response procedures and contact information.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Antenna
Description
Digitale oplossingen op maat van jouw ambities. We bedenken, ontwerpen en bouwen software en webapplicaties op maat van jouw bedrijf en de toekomst.
Key services
Custom software development, Digital platform creation, UX design, Websites and webshops, Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, CookieYes, Leadinfo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager
  • Use of consent management platform (CookieYes)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Leadinfo
Marketing tools
CookieYes, Leadinfo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with email and phone
  5. Multiple tracking and analytics tools are used, indicating moderate user tracking
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
  7. WHOIS data shows domain registered since 2018 with a reputable registrar
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook is linked
  9. Website targets business clients for custom digital solutions
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and tracking services such as Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, and Leadinfo, indicating a mature approach to user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting and domain registration are managed by a reputable registrar, team.blue nl B.V. Performance is moderate, with video content and rich media assets. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal but could be improved by adding security headers and reducing reliance on multiple tracking scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weareantenna.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weareantenna.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.