Skip to main content

Security report for weare.fi

WeAre Solutions Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WeAre Solutions Oy is a Finnish technology company specializing in digital solutions and consulting services. Their website emphasizes collaboration with clients to build a digital future, targeting business clients primarily in Finland. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and active social media channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, enhanced with SEO plugins like Yoast and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, reflecting GDPR awareness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weare.fi

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention weare.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for weare.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital development and consulting for business clients. Their market position appears stable within Finland, supported by a clear brand identity and active social media engagement. The business model is B2B, providing tailored digital solutions. The website content and metadata suggest a focus on innovation and partnership. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The absence of explicit contact details on the homepage may indicate a preference for controlled client engagement channels. The company leverages modern web technologies and SEO practices to maintain visibility and competitiveness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a presumably strong SSL configuration, which is a fundamental security measure. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating attention to privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header implementation and publish security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WeAre Solutions Oy
Description
Kehitämme ja rakennamme digitaalista tulevaisuutta yhdessä asiakkaidemme kanssa.
Key services
digital development, digital future building, consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Astra WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Finnish language targeting Finnish business clients.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage or linked.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. Multiple social media profiles linked, enhancing trust and brand presence.
  6. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins with SEO optimization.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. SSL is properly configured with HTTPS enforced.
  10. No suspicious or malicious scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, representing areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weare.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weare.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.