Skip to main content

Security report for wamwoowam.co.uk

Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website wamwoowam.co.uk serves as a personal portfolio and social hub for an individual named Thomas May. It showcases social media profiles, projects, and gaming interests, targeting a general audience interested in technology and personal content. The site is relatively new, founded in 2022, and hosted via Namecheap with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a basic but secure domain setup. The content is well organized with a Windows 8.1 start screen style interface, providing a unique user experience. However, the site lacks formal privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide direct contact information, which limits its business credibility and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wamwoowam.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model is primarily personal branding and project showcasing, with no commercial transactions or services offered directly on the site. The target audience includes followers of the individual's social media and technology enthusiasts. The site leverages multiple social platforms such as Bluesky, YouTube, Twitch, and GitHub to extend reach. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. The site’s market position is niche and personal, with moderate trust indicators due to the lack of formal policies and contact details.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, which are strong foundational elements. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No forms or sensitive data collection points are present, minimizing attack surface. The site uses minimal tracking via Umami analytics, which is privacy-friendly. Overall, the site is low risk but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add contact information or a dedicated security contact channel for incident reporting.
  3. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster trust and transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update technical stack and security configurations to maintain best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Welcome to Wam's Site! Here you'll find info about me as well as links to where to find me elsewhere on the internet.
Key services
Social media presence, Project showcases, Gaming related content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, WebAssembly (possible), SVG, WebP images, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Umami
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
umami (stats.wamwoowam.co.uk)
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for an individual named Thomas May.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided on the site.
  4. Site uses HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled, hosted via Namecheap.
  5. Social media presence is strong with multiple external links.
  6. No forms or data collection fields detected on the main page.
  7. Minimal tracking via Umami analytics, no advertising detected.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No security or incident response policies published.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, SVG, and JavaScript with a custom framework. It preloads multiple images and scripts for performance optimization. Hosting is via Namecheap with DNSSEC enabled, indicating good domain security. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and design quality. However, no CMS or common frameworks like React or Angular were detected, suggesting a custom-built solution. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. No forms or complex backend interactions were found, reducing complexity but also limiting functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wamwoowam.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wamwoowam.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.