Skip to main content

Security report for vocast.com

VOCAST · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VOCAST operates as a brand sharing platform targeting businesses passionate about their brand identity. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, leveraging WordPress with the Divi theme and performance optimizations via WP Rocket. The technical infrastructure includes modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Leadfeeder, with DNS managed through Cloudflare, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed by Cookiebot, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are visible. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-structured but could improve transparency by adding contact details and terms of service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vocast.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VOCAST positions itself as a niche platform for brand sharing, catering to businesses focused on brand marketing. The business model revolves around providing a platform service, likely subscription or usage-based, to facilitate brand engagement. The domain age of over a decade supports a stable market presence. Integration with major marketing and analytics platforms suggests active digital marketing efforts. The absence of explicit contact information and terms of service may limit user trust and business transparency. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified, indicating a focused standalone operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, which provides a solid foundation for security. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the lack of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No security.txt or incident response contact information is present, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to reduce XSS risks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response information on the website.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers by including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information and terms of service to improve business transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VOCAST
Description
You obsess over your brand. So do we. Step into where passionate brands blossom. Get in touch with VOCAST - The Brand Sharing Platform
Key services
Brand sharing platform services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, WP Rocket, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Leadfeeder, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and WP Rocket for performance optimization
  2. Cookie consent managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage or metadata
  5. No explicit terms of service page found
  6. Security headers partially implemented; HTTPS enforced
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and not privacy protected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, supported by WP Rocket for caching and performance. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Leadfeeder, and Cookiebot for analytics, marketing, and compliance. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, enhancing reliability and security. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some deferred and lazy-loaded scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vocast.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vocast.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.