Skip to main content

Security report for vmlogin.us

Suplogin LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suplogin LLC operates the website vmlogin.us, offering a specialized antidetect multi-login browser solution designed to replace multiple physical computers or VPS with virtual browser profiles. Their product targets ecommerce, social media marketing, affiliate advertising, and teams requiring secure multi-account management. The business model is subscription-based with tiered pricing plans and a free trial, positioning them as a niche technology provider in browser fingerprint control and automation. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting and domain registration are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security basics. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but missing advanced headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vmlogin.us

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets digital marketers, ecommerce operators, and affiliate advertisers who need to manage multiple browser profiles securely and efficiently. Their competitive advantage lies in providing isolated virtual browser environments with fingerprint protection and automation capabilities. The presence of multiple partner and affiliate links indicates a broad ecosystem integration, enhancing their market reach. The business is relatively young, founded in 2020, and maintains consistent domain registration data. Revenue streams likely come from subscription plans with increasing features and profile limits. The multilingual support suggests a global customer base. Strategic partnerships with proxy and captcha solving services strengthen their offering. Growth indicators include a comprehensive pricing model and active marketing via Google services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare as registrar and likely CDN, which provides baseline security. Domain transfer protections are enabled, reducing hijacking risks. However, the absence of a privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and security incident response information are notable compliance gaps. No advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Content-Type-Options were detected in the provided data. The site uses third-party analytics which may raise privacy concerns without explicit user consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could delay mitigation in case of security events. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR and other relevant compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  3. Add a security policy page including incident response contacts and procedures.
  4. Deploy advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Suplogin LLC
Description
VMlogin antidetect browser, replace multiple computers or VPS with virtual browser profiles, login and manage multiple accounts same time in one place. 100% security isolation, prevention of information leakage, suitable for ecommerce, social media marketing, affiliate advertising etc.
Key services
Virtual browser profiles, Browser fingerprint control, Multi-account management, Team collaboration, Business workflow automation, Browser automation integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome icons, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), SweetAlert2, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain transfer protection enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers virtual browser profile management software with anti-detection features
  2. Multiple pricing tiers with free trial available
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. Contact email present in meta author tag and contact page
  5. Extensive partner and affiliate network links present
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
  8. Security headers and policies could be improved
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap framework with FontAwesome icons and uses Owl Carousel for UI elements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing reliable performance and security features. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. SEO optimization is basic with meta keywords and description present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and partner logos. Technical debt appears low but could be improved with enhanced SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vmlogin.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vmlogin.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.