Skip to main content

Security report for visual-eyes.co.uk

VisualEyes · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VisualEyes is a UK-based company specializing in immersive visual content and professional video production services. Their offerings include Matterport virtual tours, drone surveys, film production, and 3D visualization, targeting sectors such as construction, manufacturing, hospitality, and public sector organizations. The company positions itself as a niche provider delivering innovative marketing and business system assets through advanced visual technologies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Astra theme, with integrations including Google Analytics and Vimeo API. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and presents professional content with clear navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled, but lacks some security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query errors, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and credible, but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching visual-eyes.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
70
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention visual-eyes.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for visual-eyes.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VisualEyes operates in a specialized market segment providing immersive digital visualization services. Their competitive advantage lies in combining multiple visual technologies to create engaging marketing and operational assets. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored solutions for clients with physical premises. The presence of case studies and client logos indicates active engagement and a portfolio of work. The use of scheduling tools like Calendly suggests streamlined client interaction. Growth potential exists in expanding digital twin and virtual tour services across various sectors. The company maintains a professional online presence but lacks visible certifications or formal security frameworks, which could be areas for future development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google Tag Manager. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency in security practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism suggests limited readiness for coordinated vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VisualEyes
Description
Offering high-quality 3D visualisation services. Transform your ideas into stunning visuals with our experienced team. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Key services
Matterport virtual tours, Drone aerial surveys, Film production, 3D visualisation and CGI, Digital twin creation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, jQuery, Vimeo API, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected on main site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails and phone numbers.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query error; domain likely registered without www prefix.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Astra theme.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are implemented for tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is business and technology focused.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. The tech stack includes jQuery, Vimeo API for video embedding, Google Tag Manager, and FontAwesome icons. Performance is moderate with some optimization evident, such as preloading scripts and lazy loading images. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site could benefit from further performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance to improve user experience and technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with visual-eyes.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review visual-eyes.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.