Skip to main content

Security report for videoask.com

Typeform · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VideoAsk, a product by Typeform, offers an interactive video platform designed to enhance business communications through video funnels, AI-powered chatbots, and multimedia messaging. The platform targets businesses aiming to improve recruitment, sales, marketing, and customer engagement at scale. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, ensuring a smooth user experience and fast performance. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms in place. However, explicit contact information and security policies are not prominently provided, and WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong market position and technical maturity with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of videoask.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching videoask.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VideoAsk operates within the technology sector as a SaaS provider focusing on interactive video communication tools. Its business model revolves around subscription services targeting medium-sized businesses and enterprises seeking scalable video engagement solutions. The platform leverages Typeform's brand and ecosystem, enhancing its market credibility. The company showcases strong trust indicators such as social proof from over 10,000 companies and professional branding consistency. Marketing efforts include the use of Google Analytics, Optimizely, and PartnerStack, indicating a mature marketing and analytics infrastructure. The absence of direct contact details and WHOIS transparency suggests a need for improved customer trust mechanisms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements key security headers, reflecting adherence to security best practices. The presence of a cookie consent banner aligns with privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits the overall security maturity. The absence of direct security contact channels may hinder incident reporting and response. Recommendations include publishing detailed security documentation and establishing clear communication channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear and accessible security contact information for incident reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Typeform
Description
VideoAsk helps you streamline your conversations and build business relationships at scale using interactive video funnels, AI-powered video chatbots, multimedia messaging, and video forms.
Key services
Interactive video funnels, AI-powered video chatbots, Multimedia messaging, Video forms, Asynchronous interviews
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely, PartnerStack
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear branding and messaging.
  3. Strong integration with Typeform ecosystem.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main site.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks including React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and optimized performance. It employs Google Tag Manager and Optimizely for analytics and A/B testing, and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility practices. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details were not identified. Performance is fast with well-structured meta tags supporting SEO. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with videoask.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review videoask.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.