Skip to main content

Security report for vebetterdao.org

Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VeBetter is a nascent Web3 platform launched in 2023 that incentivizes positive social actions by rewarding users with its native token B3TR, leveraging the VeChain blockchain. The platform targets Web3 enthusiasts and impact-driven individuals seeking to combine blockchain technology with social good. The website is professionally designed using Framer and hosted on AWS, integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Mixpanel, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter tracking. While the technical infrastructure is modern and performance is moderate, the site lacks critical privacy and security disclosures such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and incident response information. The domain is privacy protected, which is typical for early-stage Web3 projects, but no direct registrant information is available. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. Overall, the website is functional and visually appealing but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vebetterdao.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VeBetter operates in the emerging Web3 technology sector, focusing on tokenized rewards for positive actions, positioning itself as a socially responsible blockchain platform. Its business model revolves around incentivizing user engagement through token economics on VeChain. The platform appears to be a startup given its recent domain registration and lack of extensive business disclosures. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a growth-oriented approach. However, the absence of contact details and formal policies may hinder user trust and adoption. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The company targets a niche audience interested in blockchain-enabled social impact, which could provide competitive advantage if executed with strong community engagement and transparent governance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses domain status flags to prevent unauthorized domain changes, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response plan, which are important for transparency and preparedness. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis, but the absence of security best practices and policies suggests a moderate security maturity level. To improve, the organization should enable DNSSEC, implement security headers, publish security and incident response policies, and review third-party script usage for privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add contact information including official company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
VeBetter is a Web3 platform of apps that turn positive actions into rewards. Join the movement, earn B3TR, and build impact on VeChain.
Key services
Web3 platform, Reward system for positive actions, Token earning (B3TR), Impact building on VeChain blockchain
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Mixpanel, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security-related DNS flags (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Mixpanel
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Web3 platform focused on rewarding positive actions with tokens on VeChain blockchain.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the main page content.
  4. Uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Mixpanel, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter tracking.
  5. Domain is privacy protected and relatively new (created Oct 2023).
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled which is a minor security gap.
  9. Website is hosted on AWS infrastructure.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design tool, and hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring scalability and reliability. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies including Mixpanel, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter tracking, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers were detected, which are areas for technical improvement. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for enhancement to meet broader compliance standards. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires security hardening and privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vebetterdao.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vebetterdao.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.